User talk:Gabriella MNT

A goat for you!
Thank you for fixing the Christmas article. I had not seen the earlier date format changes and did not mean to revert.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC) 

"cite errors"
Would you like to tell me what and where these cite errors where ?. Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 11:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

"Complete mess with the sources"
Hi, I just noted you reverted an addition I made to the Sherlock Holmes page. Can you point out what the issue is with the sources? I'd like to get your input to make the addition better, so it would be good to see what the specific issue was. Thanks! Deathlibrarian (talk) 04:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to BBC does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! -- Renat 22:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Pro-merging IP user
Thanks for your attempts at undoing merging templates off certain Beano pages. Just writing to let you know the IP user tried to get me to report you for your hard work. Careful out there. —MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 19:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gun violence in the United States into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  11:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Alice
Hi Gabriella

Would u mind telling me which part of the Alice in Wonderland article states that there are conflicting sources for Alice Liddell being the inspiration? I re-read it and didn't understand which part you were referring to Stephanie921 (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Roald Dahl into Matilda (novel). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)