User talk:Gabrielletolliver

Gabrielle Tolliver September 27, 2018 Human Rights History Finalize Topic

Topic: How New Orleans’ prisoners were treated during Hurricane Katrina.

Previously in class I chose to do Human Rights in ,but I decided to choose a topic that was more personal. One that does not get the attention in this city, one that deserves justice. During the preparation for Hurricane Katrina, the prisoners in the city were not given any evacuation opportunities or materials needed to survive during such a massive storm. This goes against modern day human rights as we know them. Giving the incarcerated basic rights to leave the city just as any other citizen was of no importance to the leaders in the city. Their stories should not be silenced anymore ; their voices deserved to be heard. In the Hurricane Katrina article on Wikipedia there is only two sentences about the prisoners “There is evidence that many prisoners were abandoned in their cells during the storm, while the guards sought shelter. Hundreds of prisoners were later registered as "unaccounted for". What happened to these prisoners? Was there a plan for their transplant somewhere else? What occurred to the prisoners who did survive the storm? In these sources there are descriptions of how the inmates were treated and the living conditions these prisoners had to endure.

Resources: Testimonials from Inmates Incarcerated at Orleans Parish Prison during Hurricane Katrina https://www.aclu.org/files/images/asset_upload_file182_23418.pdf New Orleans: Prisoners Abandoned in Floodwater https://www.hrw.org/news/2005/09/21/new-orleans-prisoners-abandoned-floodwaters Hurricane Katrina and the Lost Prisoners of New Orleans https://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-shaw/hurricane-katrina-and-the_b_541639.html "Exile Nation: Drugs, Prisons, Politics & Spirituality" by Charles Shaw

Welcome!


Hi Im Gabby Tolliver. Im a junior at Xavier University and I am an art major.

Hello, Gabrielletolliver, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! Sam Sailor 17:28, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Are you ready for editing?
 The Adventure

Welcome!
Hello, Gabrielletolliver, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Formalism
Hi! It looks like your edits at Formalism (art) were reverted by. He didn't give an explanation in the summary, so my best guess is that it was likely phrasing - with writing, avoid the term "normal" to refer to something, since normal is relative. What's normal for one may not be for another. You also changed some content, such as nonformal to conformal, and removed the beginning of a sentence, " First, Zangwill identifies extreme formalists who think "that all works". This may be why he reverted it, so make sure that you're very careful when editing. I've tagged Jerome Kohl just in case this wasn't why he reverted. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Gabrielle's peer review
Hello Gabrielle, Great job picking your topic as it relates to human rights, because this was something I didn't know about and I'm from New Orleans. Be sure not to try and make it a persuasive piece with the evidence you're providing, but simply give them the facts of the matter. Great organization with your points and you have a good use of your sources! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccrawfo4 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)