User talk:Gabyxflores/sandbox

--Gabyxflores (talk) 07:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Gaby's Peer Review--Gabyxflores (talk) 07:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 1) This article is very well written and is provided with plentiful evidence and information to defend their points and arguments. The work done here is a great addition to the original article and more in depth. 2) However, I believe that some of the key terms stated in the article needed a little more clarification. Some of the links did not work so it would be a good idea to dix those. 3) The studies conducted by the researcher should be given a brief explanation as to why they are important in this article. 4) Very good use of citations and understanding of the research is used in this article in which builds great credibility and my own group will use this article as an example for reference.