User talk:Gades1980

January 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Slaughtering Grounds has been reverted. Your edit here to The Slaughtering Grounds was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbqxPgK87dM) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk question
It appears someone fixed the problem you pointed out. Thanks.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm McGeddon. Your recent edit to the page Streisand effect appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Streisand effect is for situations where attempts at censorship have "the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely", but I can't see that that's explicitly happened with the Slaughtering Grounds videogame - if it has, we need to quote a reliable secondary source that's said this about the review. McGeddon (talk) 09:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Statements like "James Romine was acting as Pro Se, meaning he was representing himself without a lawyer, even tho he attempted to crowdfund a lawyer unsuccessfully" in Digital Homicide Studios also require sources. --McGeddon (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)