User talk:Gadgetboy456

Welcome!
Hello, Gadgetboy456, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Urbanski-Cooper Industries
Hello Gadgetboy456,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Urbanski-Cooper Industries for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 02:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Gadgetboy456. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Urbanski-Cooper Industries, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 07:42, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Yagi–Uda antenna
Hey, I saw that you undid my edit at Yagi–Uda antenna. Just to clarify, the purpose of my edit was simply to rollback the previous vandalism that the IP / unregistered user was spamming, not sure where you got the idea that I was the vandal. If you check the actual content of the page, you'll see that my contribs only removed the bold / spam, instead of adding it. Hopefully that clears things up. Cheers Omni Flames (talk) 11:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Reverting potential vandalism
Hi Gadgetboy456. Some of your recent reversions have have not been vandalism, and some of what was reverted has been correct. This reverted a reasonable addition which did not remove content; here you actually restored vandalism; here the reversion was probably correct for the wrong reason because replacing the unknown title with a known one was reasonable but it appears to be a hoax; here you restored to -z- spellings and incorrectly identified British English as applying, whereas WP:ENGVAR means that Australian English -- which is very similar to British English -- applies here and other English varieties apply to other articles. While vandalism fighting is needed, if you continue doing so would you please ensure that where an edit is not unambiguously vandalism, you review it sufficiently to ensure that you are correctly reverting and reverting for the correct reasons. Thanks, ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I apologize for incorrectly reverting and accedentally restoring vandalism. It was my first time using the undo tool and I misread the instructions. Thank you for letting me know, and now I will not make those mistakes again. Also, I apologize for accedentally reverting your changes, as I confused the previous version and the vandalized version. Have a nice day!  Alex (talk) 11:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Alex. I've moved your reply back here as it's best to keep the thread together -- if you use either the wikilink form such as User:Hydronium Hydroxide or the template form such as, and sign your reply with ~ then whoever you mention will get notification that you've replied. Good luck, ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 03:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)