User talk:Gael.91

July 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to South Uist, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Please stop your POV pushing. Britain and the UK are not the same thing.'' Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Britain
Why do you keep changing instances of "the UK" or "the United Kingdom" to Britain? Both are correct, but Britain is more colloquial and less official and is also used to mean Great Britain (the island), so, if anything, "the UK" is better and less ambiguous. Could you stop? Thanks. JonC Talk 20:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Commonwealth citizen
You've changed 2x references in this article from "United Kingdom" to "Britain" or "British". Please do not do this in articles dealing with technical issues such as citizenship, where precision of language is important. Your edit was entirely unnecessary, and I have accordingly reverted it. Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC).

December 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glasgow North East (UK Parliament constituency). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shetland, you may be blocked from editing. --Deskford (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Outer Hebrides. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Her Majesty's Coastguard, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mais oui! (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Gately, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Will you desist from your inaccurate and POV pushing changing of references from UK to Great Britain, etc.. Engage in the talk pages if you think you have a point, otherwise you will face blocking.'' Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Starkers!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Events leading to the Falklands War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Virtually the sole purpose of this account seems to be to replace various expressions such as "the United Kingdom" with "Britain". I do not know why you have been doing this, but it has been repeatedly pointed out to you that this is sometimes factually wrong, as the two are not synonymous. It must also long ago have become evident to you that consensus is against your changes, and you have never made any attempt at all to answer messages about this issue, or to explain your reason. Wikipedia works by collaboration and consensus, not by individual editors persistently pushing their own preferred version, ignoring others' opinions and any consensus among editors. Since you show no signs at all of intending to edit cooperatively or constructively, there seems no reason to think that allowing you to continue editing would work to the advantage of the project. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)