User talk:Gaiester123

Welcome!
Hello, Gaiester123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 06:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for email. I'd prefer it if you contacted me on my talk page, since I won't reply by email anyway. I helps if you post a link to the article too, especially when you are using a different user name for the sandbox. Although using multiple accounts is permitted, you need to be careful when doing so, as any indication of inappropriate use will lead to a block. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. Simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. However, I see that the editor who nominated the page for deletion saw that the pages were copied, but didn't check the status, all three are in fact labelled as public domain. Apologies for that oversight. Still problems though Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the agency, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the agency claims or interviewing its management. Virtually all your references were to the agency itself, not independent third-party sources. Note that references should not contain bare urls or be in section headings
 * To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, funding and expenditure, not just what you do or sell.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: The PNRI is an institution of excellence in nuclear science and technology propelled by a dynamic and committed workforce in the mainstream of national development... We contribute to the improvement of the quality of Filipino life through the highest standards... effective and efficient implementation&mdash; and so on, just a sales pitch. See also Ownership of content . Furthermore, there is a lengthy section which appears to have no function other than to sell your courses.
 * You have a conflict of interest when editing this article, and you must declare it. Since you work directly or indirectly for the agency, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. . Regardless, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . Please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
 * Before attempting to write an article again, please read this guidance