User talk:Gakhar007


 * }

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Daultala1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Daultala1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 06:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Muhammad. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Muhammad, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your repeated deletion of sections from the Muhammad article and insertion of remarks indicating a wish to censor Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muhammad, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox₪ 05:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox₪ 05:53, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Logan Talk Contributions 05:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Possible further block
I am considering giving you an indefinite block. I note that not only have you ignored your earlier block, you have never entered into discussion on any talk page. This is a collaborative venture and it is essential that editors be willing to discuss their edits with others. If you refuse to do this, you probably should be working somewhere else. Dougweller (talk) 06:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)