User talk:Galathadael

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You may not use article talk pages to make accusations of wrongdoing against named living people. Your claim is unsourced and unsupported. Do not reinsert it. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * "Obama Administration" is not a person. Go read up on Stefan Halper. Even though Wikipedia has a totally whitewashed explanation of who he is, it explains who sent him. This isn't a college campus. You can't just start screaming when people start saying things you don't like.Galathadael (talk) 02:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement
There is a discussion involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history at Talk:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Sandstein  13:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems quite odd to me that the report for the long term editor who should know better will be closed with no action, and a report about a brand new editor who may not know the policies yet ends with an indefinite block. Nice work . It is not your place to decide what type of editors Wikipedia needs. Sorry Galathadael - you got chewed up in the machine - I hope you learned your lesson. Mr Ernie (talk) 15:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello Galathadael, you can still appeal your block. I would advise you make a firm commitment to follow Wikipedia policy, and review policies such as WP:BLP, WP:OR, WP:V, and other pages such as WP:RS, WP:RSP, WP:AGF, WP:RGW and WP:VNT starship.paint ~  KO   01:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)