User talk:Galdr

If you want to argue the case that IP address 68.55.128.232 has not been used for vandalism, I suggest you do so here. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 19:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I see you have a disagreement with another user, please discuss it. Your actions are bordering on harassment, which can lead to being blocked from editing. I've removed the category from the IP address that you appear to be objecting to, so that should diffuse things a bit. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

This is getting ridiculous, you're both obsessing over an IP that hasn't been used to vandalize a page in over two months, in addition to that it has made a number of legitimate edits in the past and in the time period between now and the last vandalism. Galdr (talk) 13:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Of nearly 50 edits you made, all but about two are vandalism, some of it racist. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I suggest you count again, when I went through, I got 11 legitimate edits. Eric Adams (singer), Belasco (disambiguation), Danny Elfman (this one got reverted despite the fact it was not vandalism), Slechtvalk (twice), Vlad III (might have been reverted, not because it was vandalism, but because weirdos change that page like every day), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_nudity, Snowcone (twice, I had to keep correcting someone who was incorrect), The Eye, and The Ghost Galleon. Just because several of those were minor grammatical or otherwise small edits, does not make them illegitimate, and again there has been no vandalism from my IP in two months. If you had decided to go after me for vandalism and label my page right after I vandalized a page, I would not have a problem with it, but you decided to do it arbitrarily, two months after any vandalism occurred. It seems to me you are merely on a crusade against "racists" rather than vandals. I haven't vandalized wikipedia in two months, I'm not going to do it again. Leave me alone. Galdr 16:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So you agree that about 35 to 40 of your edits were vandalism. Good, that's the first step. Do really think that won't you won't be monitored with a record like that? Nunquam Dormio (talk) 16:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44 - 11 = 33, by the way. Considering the fact you can't even do simple math, perhaps "monitoring" people and doling out unmoderated punishments should be left to the more intelligent members of the wikipedia community? Thirty three incidents of minor vandalism over seven months (five really), and none in the last two months. No I don't think I will be monitored for that, by anyone other than you, and not because I was a vandal, but because I am a "racist". This is not an incident of making a vandal known any longer. You arbitrarily decided to start harassing me two months after my last incident of vandalism, and over a month after I had even made any kind of edit. I reiterate, the last time I vandalized a page was two months ago, I haven't done it since, and I won't do it in the future. If "monitoring" me makes you feel special, then go for it, but if you continue harassing me I will report you to a moderator or administrator or whoever I have to talk to about harassment around here. Now, once again, leave me alone.Galdr 17:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)