User talk:Galelfajardo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 01:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Hall Research Technologies
A tag has been placed on Hall Research Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 01:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hall Research Technologies
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hall Research Technologies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, unreferenced company.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ttonyb1 (talk) 01:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hall Research Technologies
Putting the references on the article talk page will not help to establish Notability, please add them to article. I would also make sure they meet the requirements that define reliable, independent, secondary sources. Thanks, and my best to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

ACN turnover
Hello,

I noticed most of your edits concern ACN, including a recent clain that the annual turnover (or similar) for the company was 500 million dollars. I tried to find this information in the Hoovers page you used as a reference but I was utterly incapable of finding it. What the Hoovers summmary does state, however, is that the company has 20 employees, not 1,200 as you had stated.

Have I been looking at the wrong tabs or in the wrong columns? For the moment being, I have reverted the previous version of the article.

- Tournesol (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)