User talk:Galyet

Speedy deletion of Taitta Toweett
A tag has been placed on Taitta Toweett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Taitta Toweett
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Taitta Toweett, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Davidic line. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I need to emphasise your need to source your edits
See WP:VERIFY. Additionally, you can't use religious texts to make an argument - you can use them for statements of fact, but you can't interpret them or combine them to present a case for something. Doug Weller talk 15:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)