User talk:GameNews

Alchemic Dream
Regarding this edit where you added unsourced information to the article. I have moved this information to the talk page and challenged it. Our policy on verifiability would require you to find a reliable source because the information is now challenged. Please do not reinsert the information without reliable sourcing. Let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be glad to help. Regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Proofs
 * I can proove it, we have an interview with some former employees dealing with this company, therefore we can proove it what has been said. So please do not revert ! If requested I can send a copy of the interview to your mailaccount --GameNews (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * If you have proof, in the way of independent reliable sourcing, then we actually need to get that into the article. We will need to cite that, in order to keep the material in there.  Can you cite it into the article?  If you need help with the citation format, I can help with that.  If you like, post your references on this page (I have it on my watchlist, so I will notice when you post to this page) I can help you with the format.  Just post here what you got.  Otherwise, we are going to have to leave the content, that content, out.  You can reply here, I'll notice.  I have also made a quick note on the admin noticeboard, so they can help.  Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 21:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have seen the talk in the AdminChitChat and understand that an interview is just for you not reliable. The issue is, that 2 of the employees even went to lawyers and to the police because this company was involved of fraud (as mentioned before - not paying salery etc.)
 * I am a little helpless of what to do - can you help ? --GameNews (talk) 08:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Just as above, they will need to be published somewhere, perhaps a well known magazine, newspaper, or journal? This would be the source.  Articles don't usually take someone's word for it, it needs to be verifiable.


 * Check these two links out... they apply here:


 * Verifiability


 * Reliable sources


 * Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 12:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)