User talk:Gameadvancr

Welcome!
Hello, Gameadvancr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

September 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vietnamese Americans, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. What are you doing? You removed two large, sourced sections, claiming for one that "source link does not exist. information cannot be verified" when the links both existed and were online, and in the other case "not source cited. information cannot be found nor verified" when the information was cited to a study by Chung that is found (incoorrectly) in the further reading section. Sources do not have to be online. Meters (talk) 06:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

reason given for removal of content. no citation. chung et al does not suffice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gameadvancr (talk • contribs) 06:47, September 24, 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Vietnamese Americans. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I told you in the edit summary where the citation was and I said that I was in the process of moving it into the references.I undid you deletion and then I had to open up the file to copy the reference material so I could move it. Removing the material again in the mean time is not constructive. Meters (talk) 06:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * You should correct the citation error "Cite error: A (see the help page)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gameadvancr (talk • contribs) 07:06, September 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * I fixed the typo. Thanks for pointing it out, but next time just do it yourself. And please start signing your talk page posts. Meters (talk) 07:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Vietnamese Americans. Stop doing this. First you blanked the entire section "Valedictorian delinquent" falsely claiming that "source link does not exist. information cannot be verified" when all three of the sources were valid, and now you have removed it again, this time claiming that " it is based primarily on case study of Vietnamese enclave in New Orleans and not reflective of U.S.Vietnamese population as a whole". What of the other material and links you removed? Either discuss this deletion on the talk page or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 18:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Source was cited.

October 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Chinese Americans. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ammarpad (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Source was cited. Source was http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/fact-sheet/asian-americans-chinese-in-the-u-s/ If you oppose without credibility, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gameadvancr (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by the number of billionaires. Adamgerber80 (talk) 02:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

I have added the citation. Source is https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/#country:Vietnam

The number of billionaires in Vietnam however may be 5 instead of 4 as indicated on the forbes. See https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-18/-must-have-fish-sauce-helps-create-new-vietnam-billionaire. It is stated as of January 18, 2018, 5:00 PM Nguyen Dang Quang (who is not the Forbes billionaire list for Vietnam) has $1.2 billion.

Vietnamese versus Chinese
Hi! The reason why I included the comparisons of Vietnamese to Chinese was because the original source was doing that explicitly. WhisperToMe (talk) 11:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, Gameadvancr, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. ''You must be very careful when editing a page both logged in and out. You have now already reverted this page more than 3 times in the last 24 hours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gameadvancr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:601:9A7F:5C90:A8B9:326E:9957:436C

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:601:9A7F:5C90:8DF0:1E68:A3CA:6A0D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:601:9A7F:5C90:A913:5A69:86C4:1BA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:601:9A7F:5C90:C07D:CE0D:AFDE:9AB7

'' Poojean (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Western Michigan University Cooley Law School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.In addition, do not edit this page further while logged out. Poojean (talk) 23:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)