User talk:Games Junn

CyberGhostface
Thank you for your message about suspected IP socking by CyberGhostface. It looks so much like it that I have blocked the IP and increased the length of the named account's block. It was really interesting to see how the IP made defences against charges that had not even been made. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * np bloke. He's admitting to it now too so alls well that ends well.Games Junn (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Back By End Of Summer
Leavin now for the airport, see some of you in New Zealand!--Be back by end of summer mates! forward inquiries to my email for those of U who knos me, be it touch

Trout

 * -)  — DocOfSoc • Talk  •  06:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Back in the states
Back from New Zealand. Working at a polling firm as a gopher. Reach me in the usual places, pals.Games Junn (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Why is this here? Explain please.Games Junn (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Whacked. Unsure how to defend myself against the charge. Read the accusation. The reasoning's based on anecdotal observation and correlation. Correlation doesn't equal causation. Will appeal if blocked.Games Junn (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Looking into this I found you can perform an IP check in part and parcel of your investigation? That would clear this up. Don't dare edit the accusation page for fear of being accused of vandalism.Games Junn (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You can reach me here if you need me.Games Junn (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

I will be gone for the remainder of the day.Find me tomorrow.Games Junn (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC) It would be appreciated if others would chat with me here rather than make backhanded remarks on the other talk pages. I'm on a lunch break. You can reach me now.Games Junn (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Batman v Superman
Your edits at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice are not helping efforts by other editors to reach a consensus on the article's talk page. If you continue to engage in reverting other editor contributions before a consensus is reached, then the behavior can be considered disruptive and may be reported. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Please discuss the matter with the editors at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)