User talk:GamesterOrdinem

June 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You are trying very hard to upset me. Is it Wikipedia's corporate policy to actively upset people? You may not realize that you are corresponding with real human beings, even if you care.
 * If you do not consider the Forgotten Realms article, which you have dragged into the conversation, to be a "good article" then I would assume that you will remove it. I simply sited it as an example of the type and form of article that you have accepted, given that you decided to reject my article without explanation. There is no connection between that article or its produces and my article or myself.
 * Just like that article I simply want to post an impartial overview of a subject. If you can actually point out why my article is invalid and allow me to fix it then please do that. Otherwise please stop being obtuse and allow me to get on with this.
 * May I ask whether your response was entirely generated by AI, because it is lacking of any grasp of the situation. GamesterOrdinem (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)