User talk:Ganeshananda

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 16:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Dates
Hi. I saw your edit here to Grok. Our Manual of Style for dates recommends against linking to years in articles unless it's particularly relevant, i.e. will help the understanding of the current article in some way. For example, a music article might say "released in 1961 (see 1961 in music)". Wikilinking to full dates is recommended because the reader can localize the style with user settings, e.g. April 4 2007 will appear as "April 4, 2007" to American readers and "4 April 2007" to European readers. But this doesn't happen with "solo" years. Happy editing! --Dhartung | Talk 01:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Yoga poll
Hi! There's some discussion on whether using "asana", "yogasana" or "yoga asana" as the article title. If you are acquainted with the subject, you are invited to drop your opinion at Talk:Yogasana. Davin7 10:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Hanuman foundation
A template has been added to the article Hanuman foundation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. B. Wolterding 19:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Editing your own comments
I thought it was a bit odd to see a couple paragraphs removed from the Ram Dass talk page. In the future, see WP's guidelines on editing your own talk page comments. Since there were no replies to your statement, it doesn't seem to matter much. However, the original form wasn't disturbing in any way. Since you may be quoted elsewhere, or, in this case, since you have provided interesting information that others may want to find again sometime, it's usually best practice to leave comments up. If a talk page ever grows unwieldly, it can be archived in a number of ways, so you shouldn't have to worry too much about any comments being "too long" or irrelevant.&#8201;—&#8201;gogobera (talk) 20:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)