User talk:Ganeshbot/Archive 30

Diodora edwardsi
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Diodora edwardsi, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.schnr-specimen-shells.com/Archaeo.&amp;.Mesogastropoda.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Diodora viridula
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Diodora viridula, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.femorale.com.br/shellphotos/detail.asp?species=Diodora+viridula+(Lamarck%2C+1822). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Calliostoma ornatum
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Calliostoma ornatum, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.shellauction.net/auction_shell.php?id=422867. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Bot creating erroneous links
Within the last 24 hours or so your bot seems to have created articles about some 300 species containing the following line in the infobox:
 * superfamilia = Trochoidea

This link is incorrect, because Trochoidea is a disambiguation page. Please correct the bot so that it will link to Trochoidea (superfamily) instead on any additional pages. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It is done creating species under Trochoidea (superfamily), so will not be a problem anymore. In the future, I will check to make sure superfamilies and families do not link to disambiguation pages. — Ganeshk  ( talk ) 12:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Cerithium punctatum
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cerithium punctatum, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.gastropods.com/3/Shell_6863.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Use of bot for CfD tagging
Hi there Ganeshk, just wondering if you actually got approval to run those recent CfD taggings. If not, please remeber to in future, only use this account to run tasks which have been approved by BAG. You should use your own account for semi-automated editing, with tools such as AWB, you should never use this account for unapproved semi, fully-automated, or manual editing (it should be limited to only doing edits approved at BRfA). You are of course free to submit a BRfA for CfD tagging so you can do it in the future. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, no problems, but even the simplest tasks should really go through BAG :D. Well, there's one exception; interwiki linking by a global bot, but otherwise be sure to go through a BRfA, feel free to badger BAG if it's taking to long :D. Oh, I also meant to mention, I noticed the bot was editing very fast, don't forget to put in a 10 or so second break between edits, unless there is a need to get them done very fast. Cheers, - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Bursa cubaniana
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bursa cubaniana, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://park.org/Guests/Shells/Shell_Catalogue/Shell_Pages/C/Shell_Bursa_cubaniana.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

How many...?
Hi, how many articles are you going to add to Wikipedia about species?--Александр Мотин (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Distorsio anus
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Distorsio anus, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jaxshells.org/anus.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Phalium articles
Are you sure about all these Phalium species articles you are creating? Many are tied in WoRMS to a single out-of-print book by amature shell collectors, and the taxonomic "expert" for the clade on WoRMS is also an amature. I think you are making a big mistake creating these articles with a bot, as they should be researched and the taxonomic status of the species should be verified by an expert. This has not happened. (JaRoad (talk) 22:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC))

Category:Helix (band)
Category:Helix (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 23:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Ziziphinus
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ziziphinus, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=465614.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 21:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Ganeshbot/sandbox/Haliotis
User:Ganeshbot/sandbox/Haliotis, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ganeshbot/sandbox/Haliotis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Ganeshbot/sandbox/Haliotis during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Nerkunram


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nerkunram. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nerkundram. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nerkundram – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Uniara


A tag has been placed on Uniara, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.booking.com/hotel/in/grand-uniara-a-heritage.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Maner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IM3847 (talk) 01:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mitridae incertae sedis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitridae incertae sedis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mitridae incertae sedis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kaldari (talk) 21:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Shahabad Markanda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahabad Markanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shahabad Markanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 21:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Redirecting page:Dapoli Camp
A page you created, Dapoli Camp, is a dupe of Dapoli to which I have redirected it. Sam Sailor 04:59, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tectarius armatus


The article Tectarius armatus has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: No longer appears to be considered a valid taxa at all, and doesn't seem to have been synonymised. Completely deleted from WoRMS, and not mentioned anywhere on the genus entry either. Normally if species are synonymised, they are mentioned on the genus page, and will show up in a search, but that isn't the case.

I can't find the name used any later than 1990 on Google Scholar, and there are no entries for it on ScienceDirect. On the whole I don't think we can keep this, and there isn't a suitable redirect target that I can find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Orania


A tag has been placed on Category:Orania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Morula zebrina


A tag has been placed on Morula zebrina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an individual animal that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TL The Legend talk 19:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Narsingi, Ranga Reddy district


A tag has been placed on Narsingi, Ranga Reddy district requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 14:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lophioturris polytropus


The article Lophioturris polytropus has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No one has bothered to clean it up in 2 years. Fix or delete."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. It&#39;sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 04:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

"Vehicle Fac.tory Jabalpur" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vehicle Fac.tory Jabalpur. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Fusinus amadeus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fusinus amadeus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fusinus amadeus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DarklitShadow (talk) 04:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Onchidina guineensis


The article Onchidina guineensis has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Onchidium aberrans


The article Onchidium aberrans has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Onchidium cinereum


The article Onchidium cinereum has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Onchidium griseum


The article Onchidium griseum has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)