User talk:Ganeshsky731

Your edit to Tamil Nadu
Please see WP:INDICSCRIPT. WikiProject India's style guide does not permit the use of Indic scripts in the leads or infoboxes. -- Begoon 19:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mango. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Etymology: please use reliable secondary sources Zefr (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Mango
Yes, tell me about mango Ganeshsky731 (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm not the one who reverted, but I'll tell you. You changed reliably sourced content and used a false edit summary. If you're here to help build am encyclopedia and are willing to follow community norms, then welcome; the Teahouse, a forum for helping new users, is one click away. If, on the other hand, you make any more edits like that one, you're liable to be indefinitely blocked. Rivertorch FIREWATER  19:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Rice
Tell me why remove link Ganeshsky731 (talk) 03:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sanskrit, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nataraja, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not make uncited and contentious edits, such as assertions of the primacy of some particular language. This gives the impression of holding a nationalist point of view, which is rightly forbidden on Wikipedia.'' Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nataraja. The warning I just gave stands; and to that, I'd add that edit-warring to try to force uncited additions into articles is wholly unacceptable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

About natraj
Yes tell me Ganeshsky731 (talk) 09:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Administrative action is now likely. I'd strongly advise you to revert it yourself before that happens. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, I can't begin to imagine what makes an editor feel it is all right to add uncited materials to Wikipedia articles, especially when controversial (as on the Nataraja talk page from a few years back, if you care to look). It might be useful to reflect on WP:RS, WP:V, and for that matter WP:N, all of which are basic policies. If you don't like these things, there are two constructive courses: campaign to modify the policies (good luck with that), or go and work on a different website without such policies. Wikipedia relies completely on its sources. It'd be interesting to hear what you think. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)