User talk:Gantuya eng

Oriflame
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oriflame, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Oriflame. Argyriou (talk) 17:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Pity that this article is listed for deletion. Gantuya eng (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Contributions on talk pages
Hi Gantuya, please never ever edit the contributions of other editors on talk pages. In a discussion, every editor will offer their opinion in the way they themselfes want to state it. If another editor goes and changes that, then they will put words in somebodys mouth that the person never intended to say. That's very bad style, just as it would be bad style in a real-life discussion. You don't like it if other people "correct" your opinions either, do you? Also, tags are meant for article pages, not for discussions. There is no requirement that an editor provide sources for every statement they make in a discussion. Because of all that, I'm going to restore the contribution by Bogomolov.PL on Talk:Ulan Bator to what he really wanted to say. --Latebird (talk) 06:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

g
Hi! g before a consonant does not have dots, does it? Regards, Yaan (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That's right. That's why it shouldn't be "gh". As I understood (I may have misunderstood) from a discussion with User:Nanshu, "gh" is a "g" with 2 dots before a masculine vowel. Gantuya eng (talk) 05:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * My understanding is that 'gh' is just the g that comes with vowels like a. 'g' without 'h' is the g that comes with vowels like e. But these are just conventions anyway. I reverted your edit mainly because it turned a blue link red. Regards, Yaan (talk) 11:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * But it's impossible to pronounce that hard "g" with "h" (meaning g with 2 dots) before a consonant. It will require a hard (masculine) vowel like "a". Pls understand. Gantuya eng (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I am afraid I don't understand. If you can pronounce Hutagt, then you should also be able to pronounce Khutughtu - my understanding is that when the word contains vowels like 'a' (masculine vowels?), then you don't write 'g', you write 'gh' (or γ "gamma"). Whether the 'gh' has dots or not is a different question: If it is followed by a vowel, the 'gh' gets dots (lest it be mistaken for a 'kh' or 'q'), if it is followed by a consonant, it gets none (because there is no 'kh' before consonants). So you write khaghan and khutughtu, but köbsögöl and ligden (not so sure about the correct spelling of the latter in the traditional script, but you get the idea). Yaan (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I've looked up that discussion with User:Nanshu and seen I misunderstood what he explained. gh represents masculine forms of g and just g represents the feminine forms of g. It's not about the 2-dot form. Regards, Gantuya eng (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Ulaanbaatar
Plese never move articles while the discussion is still going on. Wikipedia does things based on consensus. Your personal perception (or mine) of what may have been "proven" is of no importance. --Latebird (talk) 02:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

1696 Battle of Zuunmod(?)
Hi,

I am currently a bit confused about where that decisive battle in 1696 took place. I think the place is called Juun modu in a book I have, and it is said to be at the Tuul river and not too far from Ulaanbaatar. The first and the last bit seem to be consistent with a battle at what is now the center of Central Aimag, but the Tuul river thing is apparently not. Is Juun modu the same word as Zuunmod, and is this a case of several places having the same name, or a case where a place name migrated some dozen kilometres? Regards, Yaan (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Juun modu and Zuunmod are the same word. It's in the area of Terelj. There are many places with the same name. Gantuya eng (talk) 05:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot. I actually found a source stating the battle took place near what is now UB, and directly south of it, but just to be on the safe side I will still remove this stuff from the Zuunmod article. Yaan (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The battle place was near the site where the Terelj river joins the Tuul river. A site with a group of a few trees standing separately is called "Zuunmod" (hundred trees). There are many places with that name -- to the north, east, south of UB. I think I saw somewhere that text speculating the battle site to have been to the south of UB. The author seems to have assumed (erroneously) it's the same as town Zuunmod. Gantuya eng (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I guess it is very easy to make this confusion. My source was in German, so maybe you saw something else. In any case it did not go into any further detail, so it is probably not reliable enough. Yaan (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

1921/ far eastern republic
Hi, I wonder if troops of the far eastern republic played any role in the 1921 events. The topic that made me wonder is Timeline of Mongolian history. Regards, Yaan (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Good question. I remember the school map of history showing arrows under legend "the troops of the Far Eastern Republic" for the 1921 events. As I understand the Far Eastern Republic was indeed part of the the Soviet Russia, but was formed by Moscow in the conditions when Siberia was cut away by Kolchak. Gantuya eng (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Sain baina uu!
Sain baina uu!

End zarim hesegt mongoliin tuuhtei hesegt guivsan esvel dutuu medeelel mash ih baina. Ene talaar yamar bodoltoi baina ve.

Hundetgesen,

--Enerelt (talk) 02:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Tiim zuil olon bgaa baih. Gehdee chuham ali ni gedgiig jishee bolgon helne uu? Gantuya eng (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Tuhailbal Mongol invasion of Java gedeg article oruultal neg gishuun iim ulgert bi itgehgui ged dairaad baisan. Tegehdee yahavee tsag hugatsaa yavsar bidnii gaihamshigt tuuhig humuus uneneer ni medeeg boloh baih. 3 jilin umnuh uyig bodvol end baiga article-uu d iluu saijirsan shu. Ta buheni achaar. --Enerelt (talk) 03:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Gantuyad

"Mongolian history" articliig unshij baigaad nereer chin haigaad orood irlee, bas discussion deer baigaa margaaniig sonirhoj unshiv, ih heregtei yum hiij baigaa hun baina, Mongoliin talaar zuv medeelel bichij umguulj baigaag haraad bayarlav baharhav tuuhee ih sain meddeg bololtoi. Bi gadaadad surdag oyutan zarimdaa humuus Mongoliin talaar iimee tiimeer yum yriad hujaatai holij hutgahaar yag belen helchih barimtgui bolood alba bolgood angli wiki deer orj irsiin. Za buun nurchihlaa Gantuya chi shu l gej heleh gesiin! :) -Tulgaa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.16.127 (talk) 08:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Bayarlalaa ! Gantuya eng (talk) 09:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Umard yuan gedeg nerig Үгэч Хашиха хэрэглэхээ больсон ч гэсэн түүний хаанчлал удаагүй. Аругтайд хорлогдсоны дараа алтан ургынханаас дахин өөр хүн болох Доголон Төмөрийн талыг баримтлагч Өлзий төмөр Буяншир гарч ирсэн. Иймээс Умард/Хойд Юан гэдэг нэрийг хэрэглэж явсан нь зөв байх гэж үзэж байна. Чамайг надтай байнга санал солилцож байгаасай гэж хүсч байна. Удахгүй болох наадмын баярын мэнд хүргэе, --Enerelt (talk) 03:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Bayarlalaa. Chamd ch bas udahqui boloh bayariin mend hurgye. Gantuya eng (talk) 08:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

thanks
Thank you a lot for the roses. And happy Naadam. :) Yaan (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * :) Gantuya eng (talk) 05:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Tibetan naming conventions
A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks&mdash;Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 20:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the news and your efforts to bring the Tibetan naming to order. I will have a look and see if I can contribute any idea. You know, this's not aiming to blame you, I received a notification about your message on my email. I didn't receive any such notification to my email from Wikipedia before (except direct emails from a few users). It frightened me "What have they done to me again?". Is there a way to disable receiving notifications about changes in my TalkPage to my email? Please understand right, I don't want to offend you with this emotion. Gantuya eng (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, I found and disabled it. Gantuya eng (talk) 00:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Buddhist temples
Adding red or black links to this article is not the correct solution to your problem. Please create List of Buddhist temples in Mongolia, then link it as the "main article" under Mongolia. We cannot list every Buddhist temple in the world in a single list article. Not only is it completely impossible, but it would make the article useless as a directory to other Wikipedia articles and would encourage other editors to add entires that are neither notable nor useful. Please use subarticles to accomplish your goal. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 16:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

And of course the correct way to encourage the creation of articles for these temples is to add them at requested articles. Yworo (talk) 16:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

жанаг гаг дог

 * жанаг гаг дог

Service award
In recognition of your 4 years of service with over 4000 edits, I present you with this service award, which you may place on your user page if you like. You will find other variants and userboxes equivalent to this award here. Yworo (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Wow. That makes my day shine. Thank you. :) Gantuya eng (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Norway West River.JPG
 * File:Norway West Town.JPG

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 00:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)