User talk:Gaptek

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Wuh Wuz  Dat  16:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Darwins vs al quran
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Darwins vs al quran, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  16:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Darwins vs al quran
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Darwins vs al quran, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  16:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Re Darwins vs al quran
This article has been deleted again, and I would request that you do not recreate it for the following reasons. Firstly, it has been deleted as being a Copyright violation of this website. I have looked into this, and note while it does not carry a copyright symbol it does link to www.harunyah.com which is noted as copyright 2010. Even though, per this page, it says that "These materials may be freely copied, printed and distributed, with credit given to this site" that this might not be sufficient for it to be used in Wikipedia - whose licensing allows content to be altered and amended.

Lastly, the website being copied - and the material - is not notable encyclopedic content; it is an opinion or statement of belief. The beliefs of the author Harun Yahya are already covered in the Adnan Oktar article, and unless you can show independent reliable sources that indicate the notability of the qurandeniesdarwinism site then it is not sufficient for an article. Again, I would advise you that the content is not appropriate for an encyclopedia - nothing to do with the value of the comments, but that it falls outside the purpose of such a type of publication. LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)