User talk:Garchy/Archive 1

License tagging for Image:Band photo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Band photo.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Gusterband.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gusterband.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Newburystreet comics.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Newburystreet comics.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Stub tags
Hallo, Please remember that stub tags go at the end of an article, per WP:ORDER, not at the top as you added to Wide area file services. Thanks. Pam D  16:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! Fixed another article as well.

Speedy deletion nomination of Taneja Group


A tag has been placed on Taneja Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MelanieN (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd be open to userfying the article if you like, that way you can work on adding all the bells and whistles to the article while its in your userspace and then move it over to the article main space. Would that work? TomStar81 (Talk) 23:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

That would be great, thank you! Garchy (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the long delay, I don't make a habit of checking other people's user talk pages for replies, so when I saw no immediate message from you on my talk page I assumed that my solution was not one to you liking. That was m'bad. At any rate, your material has been restored and moved to your userspace, you can find the page at User:Garchy/Taneja Group. Good luck on reworking it, but know that it is still subject to deletion in the main page space unless it can satisfy the primary and secondary notability criteria on Wikipeda. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
—Bagumba (talk) 08:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wade Miley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allen Webster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

The Inside Corner : January 25, 2015
What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:
 * Project news: hidden infobox text, free e-book access, distance of Mays's catch
 * Around the horn: Hall of Fame inductees, record contract
 * Showcase: Pedro Martínez
 * Opinion: calling for contributors

Read the newsletter · unsubscribe · sent on behalf of WikiProject Baseball by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

The Inside Corner&thinsp;: March 15, 2015
What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:
 * Project news: The Catch, seasonal MLB draft pages, All-Star counts in player infobox
 * Around the horn: Caribbean Series, spring training, Will Ferrell
 * Showcase: Spring training
 * Updates: team roster updates

Read the newsletter · unsubscribe · sent on behalf of WikiProject Baseball by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Boston Molasses Disaster
Reverted your revert - if we are citing that source, that source does indeed reference two different sounds: "Suddenly there was a loud rumbling sound and then a "rat-a-tat-tat" that witnesses described as sounding like a machine gun." Echoedmyron (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

No hard feelings!
Sorry for all the revert issues. Glad we are clearing them up. :) As for genres, I'm aware that most genres are unsourced on wikipedia and I'm sure you have encountered as much as I have that most edits I see on music articles are genre warriors. In the past, I was more general, but I don't think it's fair for us to just pick and choose the genres we want as music genre (especially underground sub-sub-genres) are subjective. There's a rule on wikipedia (which I can't find at the moment, bare with me as some stuff is buried :) ) that states we can't use other wiki pages as sources, even if they are cited. So for albums articles to be high quality, we need to find specific sources about the albums itself. This is especially for true bands who have existed for a long time, as music styles change and fluctuate.

So that's why I'm saying it's best to try and find sources for music specifically on a per album and per song basis. It's more accurate, and makes our work more professional. I'm open to hear your thoughts on the matter too of course. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, I'm glad we were able to resolve this on a good note! I'm always trying to improve Wikipedia in the best way (by sticking to consensus), so I appreciate you filling me in about the specific editing nuances for the music genre (which I'm new to editing!) Just curious, and I do agree with your statement about not using other wiki's articles to cite: What is the best way to find an official genre for a band or album? I know it can be tough since so many different critics and professional sources can vary widely on this subject! Thanks again, Garchy (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * There's no found "great way" that the article likes to use, but most people prefer to use reviews of the album to discuss the sound and style of albums. If they contradict each other, either place both or go with the one that seems to go more into detail about how it sounds or why the album fits into the genre. I tend to like music that sort of blurs genres and for articles I worked on like Glass Swords (which I went with the most broad statement from Spin magazine) or Quique which spanned several genres but found two sources suggesting it doesn't really fit into any specific genre (Allmusic and Pitchfork). Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion
You tagged Ti Poniro Mou Zitas as an A1 and a A9, however I've removed both tags. It doesn't lack context, at it defines itself to be a studio album, and the artist, Eleni Foureira, does have a Wikipedia article, so A9 doesn't apply. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments, it may not fit A1 and A9 but it certainly looks to not fit the notability requirements. I may have had the tags incorrect, so I'll tag the article with the proper tags, so as to keep the issues listed so they can be resolved. Thanks, Garchy (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree it's almost certainly not notable enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:04, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Rather than tag, how about help?
You tagged WMDE for speedy deletion, even while I was in the process of editing and creating the page. Rather than just tagging random pages for speedy deletion, how about you jump in and help improve the page? Your assistance is welcome! Tadpole256 (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Greetings, hope there are no hard feelings. I'm on New Pages patrol, and tagged the page per notability guidelines (no references, something I was not able to find much of through a quick Google search) - I promise I don't tag pages unnecessarily :) - to avoid a repeat tagging of a speedy delete you may want to create a page in your sandbox area first, and then transfer it once it meets the basic Wikipedia layout/notability guidelines. If you have any other questions I'd be happy to give you my take! Thanks, Garchy (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No Hard feelings at all, I've just never had a page so speedily tagged before. As you can see, I am rounding it out with additional information and references at this time. Perhaps you could make a note of that fact on the talk page of the article, so that it does not actually get deleted? -Tadpole256 (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course! I can't guarantee that it won't be deleted or tagged by someone else, but you seem to have made a lot of progress already to avoid some of the concerning items with the page! I'll add a construction tag to let people know it's a work in progress. Cheers! Garchy (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see it's already done :) Garchy (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple
In case you hadn't noticed, I brought this page up for discussion at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. I have also been trying to communicate with the page creator, without success. 220  of  Borg 00:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I just noticed the author removed my PROD, but another editor seems to have picked it back up! Garchy (talk) 02:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taneja Group logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Taneja Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Resolved, image is in use on a new page currently under construction in my sandbox. Garchy (talk) 02:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taneja Group logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Taneja Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I the Mighty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

I very hate you!
Are you crazy? Or mad???? Tuyết xanh (talk) 07:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This certainly isn't the best way to work with other editors...you have been warned about your disruptive editing by multiple users, not just me. You may want to avoid making personal attacks on users. Garchy (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Rollback
I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AGarchy granted] the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 21:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

CJ-10
Hello Garchy,

I have read the source regarding CJ-10 received help from foreign technology. The source is old and is an article which is not reliable. The Chinese have been developing this missile for over a decades.

I removed the rumor or alleged claim because it appears that people try to paint the Chinese of copying, stealing or getting help for everything they do which itself is not true and unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.116.169.39 (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, and thank you for taking the time to reply on my talk page. Please don't forget to sign your posts with 4 tildes for easy/quick identification. I understand how the claim you removed may upset some, but it is a legitimate document with proper citations and references, you can't just remove it. Since Wikipedia is worldwide we need to include all word views - perhaps a rewording is in order, but simply removing would not be the best option. We could reword it to say "some have claimed", or something similar. Thanks - Garchy (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

370 flight
what the hell are you talking about the talk page was used for comments that had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the subsection! and yet you hit my talk page with a vandalism notice!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 20:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * , You are editing other user's comments on a talk page, which is not allowed. The issue isn't whether they are on topic or not, it's the fact you are going against consensus and starting a revert war. Please leave the comments, whether you find them relevant or not. They are not yours to delete. Garchy (talk) 20:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Removal of other users comments from a talk page, that is NOT your own user talk, is akin to refactoring others comments. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * and that is a lie - many times over the years others have removed or modified my comments on talk pages - so i know it as a fact that things can get remoed - I WILL SAY IT AGAIN THE 3 COMMENTS I REMOVED HAVE A B S O L U T E L Y    N O T H I N G   T O   D O   W I T H   T H E   S U B S E C T I O N  !!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 20:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry your comments have been removed in the past on talk pages, they should not have been removed if they weren't disruptive or vandalism, or deleted after a consensus has been reached. If that happens again you should send them similar warnings to what you have received, or report them. If you are worried that the topic will get diluted you can create a new section under the talk page, and steer people to that to stay on topic. I understand your frustrations, but please don't react the same way as those who have annoyed you in the past by rewording/deleting your own comments! Garchy (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Just because you have vandalised pages in the past and it has gone unnoticed, that does not mean it is permissible. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Rod Edge
Can this source (http://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2013/sep/13/grand-theft-auto-5-dan-houser) confirm that the name be added? Typhoon966 (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me - if you haven't already I'll add it back with the ref. Thanks - Garchy (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

My edits to Dance Gavin Dance
You are correct. I was mistaken. I thought I had verified the members from touring musicians, but I had not. That is why I did not follow-up at the article where the edit was reverted. I assumed that you were chastising me incorrectly. Sorry for calling you a liar: I was at fault and you were correct. If I could remove that edit summary from history, I would. Being mistaken does not equate to not being willing to work with other editors though. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 23:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Dimitrios Kazazis
Hello there. Exactly which part of the article is poorly sourced in your opinion? The three sources I used cover literally 100% of the article's content. Gtrbolivar (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, - I did not tag the article as poorly sourced, but I did place a tag asking for additional citations for verification. This tag won't affect the livelihood of the article (I did not tag it for deletion, as I believe the subject fits notability guidelines), but will hopefully motivate other users who are familiar with the subject matter to expand the article with more context and citations :) I hope th:at helps! Garchy (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe there is another template for article expansion, the one you used is exclusively about sources and verification. Anyway, take care man. Gtrbolivar (talk) 17:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , there are tags for expansion by an expert or to expand from a foreign-language article, but since this is a WP:BLP the sources/verification one would be a safer bet (these types of articles are held to a much stricter degree) - since that is required in addition to expansion. Happy editing! Garchy (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)