User talk:Garfield7380

July 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Horror fiction has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Horror fiction was changed by Garfield7380 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937368 on 2017-07-11T17:37:15+00:00.

Draft
I moved your new article to the draft space (Draft:Mathieu-François Pidansat de Mairobert) where you can work on it until it is ready for submission. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathieu-François Pidansat de Mairobert has been accepted
 Mathieu-François Pidansat de Mairobert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Mathieu-François Pidansat de Mairobert
Your article appears to be a direct translation of the French Wikipedia article of the same name, yet I can't find any mention of this in its history or talk page. Please read the pages on translation and copying within Wikipedia, and follow the guidelines. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 10:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Speed Langworthy


A tag has been placed on Speed Langworthy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  02:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We Men Must Grow a Mustache


A tag has been placed on We Men Must Grow a Mustache requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  02:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Speed Langworthy

 * @Garfield7380 The article content was restored to Draft:Speed Langworthy by the deleting admin after I requested it from them. I see that you worked on this considerably after I tagged it. I apologize for not revisiting it after tagging it, and the admin who deleted probably should have declined the CSD. I am going to restore it back to the article space now as I belive that in its current state it should not have been deleted in the first place. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  00:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Speed Langworthy) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Speed Langworthy, Garfield7380!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good work expanding this article after it was tagged for CSD, sorry for not checking back on it. This one fell through the cracks a bit. A good start on the article with plenty of sourcing."

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—  InsertCleverPhraseHere  01:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

We Men Must Grow a Mustache
Note: I asked for the deleting admin to restore We Men Must Grow a Mustache to Draft:We Men Must Grow a Mustache, as it was deleted because the author didn't have an article (he does now). Ping me if you think it is ready for the article space and I will move it over for you. Cheers. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  07:13, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johann Ludwig Casper has been accepted
 Johann Ludwig Casper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  10:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Clarification about Über Nothzucht und Päderastie und deren Ermittlung Seitens des Gerichtsarztes
First, sorry about the stalking. I checked your contributions earlier and noticed the draft you were working on and chucked it in my watchlist (I'm seriously not looking over your shoulder!).

What is the most notable thing about this publication? From what I understand this is an early example of a discussion of male homosexuality as 'innate' or 'innocent' or something along those lines and he discusses it as pederasty? I am relying on Google translate here, so any clarification would be great. If we can clarify it in the article (why it is notable and what it is about), I'd like to suggest it for WP:DYK. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  10:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

It is considered the first article to state the currently accepted scientific belief that homosexuality is biological. It is an article about homosexuality, but is partly about crimes against boys. This is common in 19th-century medical writings about homosexuality, such as the works of Auguste Tardieu. It may be stereotypical, today, but a lot of stereotypes were considered truth in that era. It is possibly as a result of the social Darwinism. The word homosexualität (original word for being homosexual) did not exist in 1852, and, therefore, there was no better word choice. The term knabenschander is a possible exception.

Your recent edit at Sappho
In reply to your question here, I reverted your edit because: (As an aside, the source is also not primary with regards to Sappho, and even if it were that wouldn't necessarily mean that it had to be cited. See WP:PRIMARY and WP:USINGPRIMARY for more about Wikipedia's approach to primary sources.)
 * 1) The source you added did not support the claim that you put it with.
 * 2) The source is not a reliable source to cite for claims about Sappho: the main objections are that it is not by a specialist, and it is massively out of date.

Hope that helps. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Otis has been accepted
 Charles A. Otis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Ham tech  person  19:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Charles_A._Otis help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheridan Cemetery (Sheridan, New York) (December 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheridan Cemetery (Sheridan, New York) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sheridan_Cemetery_(Sheridan,_New_York) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sheridan_Cemetery_(Sheridan,_New_York) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 01:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:We Men Must Grow a Mustache


Hello, Garfield7380. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "We Men Must Grow a Mustache".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sheridan Cemetery (Sheridan, New York) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sheridan Cemetery (Sheridan, New York), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Homelessness in popular culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homelessness in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Homelessness in popular culture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)