User talk:Garhwalking

December 2015
Hello, I'm JJMC89. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Negi (caste). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Negi (caste) was changed by Garhwalking (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850419 on 2015-12-06T06:17:35+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Negi (caste) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Negi (caste). Serols (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)