User talk:Garrepi

Girbau
Hi Garrepi, thank you for your info, we have never pretended to advertise our company in Wikipedia, we have seen that Electrolux, a similar company, but much more bigger, has info about their company in Wikipedia, that is the reason we have included ours. I do no understand why they can include their info and you delete ours. thank you for your time Merce Bover GIRBAU, S.A. (MBover)


 * I have no objection to an article about Girbau. However, wording like "Girbau is well-known in the market for its ability to give tailor-made solutions to their customers’ needs" and "Girbau is able to offer all the equipment required by any laundry facility" make it obvious that you are promoting the company instead of describing it objectively. It's also considered very bad form to remove notice boxes from a page that you created. --Garrepi 10:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Garrepi, thanks for your comments, I have modified our page following your indications, I think that now this is a literature about our company not an advertisiment, what do you think? I have professional deformation when writing about our company, sorry. thanks for your help. Merce Bover (MBover)


 * It's much better now. I replaced the "advertisement" message with a "clean-up" one to encourage people to help you format the page. Sorry if I was rude before. Garrepi 09:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Kyereh Mireku
User:Kyereh Mireku (talk • contribs)

Hmmm... What shall we do about this guy? I've already warned twice. (|-- UlT  i  MuS  ( U • T • C 10:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it's some kid who doesn't know to check the talk page. Can someone temp block him? Garrepi 10:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I gave a blatantvandal warning. If this persists, feel free to list him on WP:AIV. (|-- UlT  i  MuS  ( U • T • C 10:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Garrepi 10:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Site Speedies
How obnoxious is it that NN websites can't be speedied? I don't understand why the guidelines are so lenient when it comes to websites spamming with their own pages. Have fun with bitHAUL, I took Schlogger. Garrepi 13:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Heh. I hear ya, man. (|-- UlT  i  MuS  ( U • T • C 13:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

ZING!
Saw while watching RC that your speedy tag was removed from ZING!, I've therefore nominated it for the normal deletion process - Articles for deletion/ZING! - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 09:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Flash Remembrance
Just posting a remembrance, as it is 2 years since the legend of ball Antoine "Flash" Howard died of a brain tumour. There was surely never a quicker baller, and never will be another like him. "Flash", always in the memory. Check out his page or mine for to post your condolences. Andrew 09:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

AND1 isn't solely streetball
Totally agree on your comments on the streetball page, the game goes way beyond AND1. Sure they've done a lot for the game, but its all about the inner city game, giving people a chance to perfrom at a serious grassroot level. Millm0w 11:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Target
I'm in the process of cleaning up the Bullseye disambig page, and created Bullseye (target) to take all the non-dab information about bullseyes. I noticed that you had pointed out a similar problem with the dab-page Target, and wanted input from you. Should we have a page about targets (called what?), and include the bullseye information as a section? Or a page about targets and a page about bullseyes? Or? Sanguinity 20:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The consensus on the Target disambig page seems to be that the definition of a target as something to aim at is a dictionary definition and shouldn't be included (though I tend to disagree). It seems redundant to have separate entries for the bullseye symbol and the bullseye of a target, so I think your bullseye (target) page is probably the most appropriate place to direct people looking for either. If there's enough information to warrant it, we could include a section on the page called "Uses of bullseye symbol" to describe when and why people have used the logo. --Garrepi 20:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:JuliusPeppersTrainingCamp2006.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:JuliusPeppersTrainingCamp2006.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:JuliusPeppersTrainingCamp2006.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:JuliusPeppersTrainingCamp2006.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:PurpleCauliflower.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PurpleCauliflower.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 09:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WROQ.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WROQ.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- RG2 10:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:CCES_Crest.jpg
I have tagged Image:CCES_Crest.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- RG2 10:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:PittsburghLibertyBridgeNight.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PittsburghLibertyBridgeNight.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:40145728_8efc721c34.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:40145728_8efc721c34.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:FallsParkSign.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FallsParkSign.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:JuliusPeppersTrainingCamp2006.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JuliusPeppersTrainingCamp2006.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:GreenvilleSC_NathanielGreene.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GreenvilleSC_NathanielGreene.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:GreenvilleDrive.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GreenvilleDrive.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:AND1Tour2005Floor.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AND1Tour2005Floor.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 10:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christ Church Episcopal School


The article Christ Church Episcopal School has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability. There is not any significant coverage in WP:SECONDARY reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jacona (talk) 21:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)