User talk:Garret Beaumain

Ukraine: occupation by the Soviet Union
Dear Sir!

As I see from your judgment, you are not a historian neither a lawyer. The Ukraine (Peoples Republic of Ukraine) was an independent state recognized by several "civilized" (Western) countries in 1918 (including future Allies: France, GB and even Soviet Russia). According to International law, it is a necessary condition for the recognition of an independent country; and it continued to be independent after occupation by the Soviet Russia (the USSR) in 1920-s (the Ukrainians continued to struggle up to 1928). The independent Ukraine has the government in exile in London: the government represented the nation in international relations. Due to some political reason, the Allied countries recognized the USSR, banished from the League of Nations, as ally and equal member of the anti-Hitler coalition.

However, it is important to stress the fact that many prominent aces were Ukrainians: not Russian, not Soviet, namely Ukrainians, whose Fatherland was temporarily occupied by Russia (called the USSR).

In the list of aces is Croatian and Slovakian aces. However, coalition members did not recognize the independence of their countries - Germany puppets. Before and after the war, these countries were not independent. Should we erase the name of the heroes from the list? Should we write them as the Czechoslovakian or the Yugoslav? According to U, we should!

Denying the role of the Ukrainian nation in the war - you just insult the whole nation. According to U, it is the same to deny Holocaust of the Jews because of some reason. I suggest you do it unintentionally. In any case, your opinion is illegal. I hope, you are not Russian (chauvinist) who deny everything Ukrainian... just because he is a chauvinist. In that case, you can state everything you wish.

Sincerely, --94.45.129.254 (talk) 00:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

sib-wiki vote
I authorise that this vote to support closure of sib-wiki was cast by me. Garret Beaumain 23:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Kudos:
Peter Vasiljev: Thanks for your contributions to the Aria article! It's great to see on of my favorite bands on Wikipedia!

Image tagging for Image:Aria 1986.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aria 1986.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Aria-live-18-11-03.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aria-live-18-11-03.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Alisa-Izgoy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alisa-Izgoy.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Aria 1986.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aria 1986.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ptr ru 13:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Aria-live-18-11-03.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aria-live-18-11-03.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ptr ru 13:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Alisa-Izgoy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alisa-Izgoy.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ptr ru 13:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Melnitsa-Master-ot-Mill.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melnitsa-Master-ot-Mill.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 12:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Wait and See
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nu%2C_pogodi%21_%28game%29&diff=112955780&oldid=100135075

And? "Wait and See" is the in-game text that refers to the game. "Wait and See" is the game's English name. WhisperToMe 04:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought it's translated tittle. Article is written like if "Ну Погоди!" is the original name of the game, and "Wait and See!" is the translation. If I'm wrong, please correct me.Garret Beaumain 19:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There isn't any real translation; as apparent from the links, both names are in the in-game screen. There is only one version of the game. There is no in-game dialog. Both names are in the original name, and written by the same authors. WhisperToMe 07:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

As seen here: http://www.encyclopedia-obscura.com/gphcs/gameswait/title.gif - Both names are present in the sole version. The game uses "Wait and See" as its English name, and "nu, pogodi!" as its Russian name. WhisperToMe 07:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Ig Nobel
Neat tidbit about the Russian name for the Ig Nobel prizes. Can you point to anywhere that uses it - in case somebody comes along who fears that it's vandalism; it would be good to have a citation in the article. - DavidWBrooks 17:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

This is not vandalism. Even the russian wiki page for IgNoble is named "Шнобелевская премия". I'll also add the link to a russian news source. Garret Beaumain 23:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Catharsis band.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Catharsis band.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON   Let's talk  05:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of G.E.N.E.
An editor has nominated G.E.N.E., an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

True Metal
moved to Talk:Gods of War (Manowar album)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Aria-Lost_Paradise.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aria-Lost_Paradise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Aria-Colisey.jpg
I have tagged Image:Aria-Colisey.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Aria-Alien.jpg
I have tagged Image:Aria-Alien.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Catharsis (band)
I've nominated Catharsis (band), an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Catharsis (band) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Catharsis (band)& and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Catharsis (band) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rackabello 12:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Manowar
Moved to Talk:Gods of War (Manowar album). Don't discuss it there.

Fair use rationale for Image:Alisa-Izgoy.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alisa-Izgoy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Anatoly_Krupnov.jpg
I have tagged Image:Anatoly_Krupnov.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 13:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Aria-lineup-2006.jpg
I have tagged Image:Aria-lineup-2006.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 09:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Gorbachev
Hi, Garret! Regarding Mikhail Gorbachev, you are clearly misunderstanding what the yo article is saying. You said that "Russians never spell [this word] 'Gorbachyov', because yo follows 'ch'", but that is plain incorrect. The Russian letter "ё" is, of course, pronounced (and sometimes trancribed) as "o" after postalveolar fricatives, but it does not mean it is transliterated/romanized as "o", yet alone "spelled by Russians" as such (the Russian spelling is Горбачёв, not Горбачов, although the latter is a valid last name as well). Please read the transliteration, romanization, and transcription articles for the differences between the concepts and note that in the Gorbachev article the word you keep editing is a romanization of this person's last name; spelled in full accordance with WP:RUS. I will restore proper romanization once again, but please do let me know if you have further questions. As a native Russian speaker who very much loves the letter "ё", I think I'll be able to address your questions satisfactorily :) Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The argument
Hello.

Russian rock for years is my favorite music genre, i know alot about it and i know all the classic Russian rock bands. Folk-rock was a characteristic of most classic Russian rock bands. Listen to some of the albums of Aquarium from the 80's, and the 90's to. Russian instruments, Russian folk music used, Russian national themes in the text. Many songs of DDT use Russian folk themes and in many songs they use a woman folk-choir on backing vocals, singing in the Russian folk way. Alisa have a few songs which are Russian folk rock.

Lets continue to the 90's. Many of the songs of Karol i Shut are set in a Russian-village, and many times traditional Russian characters are used.

So as you can se, folk rock was always in Russian rock. M.V.E.i. 10:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If you want certain examples of songs or explanations or anything like that feel free to ask. M.V.E.i. 10:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Please, what you do to article is pushing your point of view. Didn't you read articles on Alisa, DDT, Korol i Shut, and other bands? They don't play folk music, no sources cite them as folk music - everywhere they mentioned, they are referred to as simply "rock" bands. What seem to you "folk themes" don't make the band a folk music band, which is a specifyic genre. Your opinion is not enough.Garret Beaumain 08:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not my POV it's facts, they all use elements of folk-Rock. Folk rock can be hard rock, alternative rock, anything. What makes it folk is using national elements. They are referred to simply as rock bands due to the fact that they creat music in many rock genres. M.V.E.i. 10:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. What YOU do is pushing your POV. M.V.E.i. 10:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Kipelov&Mavrik-Smutnoye Vremia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kipelov&Mavrik-Smutnoye Vremia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The link you gave is broken
The link you gave was broken so i delete the statement again. If you want it to stay at least change the formulation of the sentence from: "Folk rock music was led to public attention following..." to: "Folk rock music had a revival following...", i think it's a fair compromise. M.V.E.i. 10:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I returned your statement, and re-wrote it as i said should be done. I wrote it as a section above the pagan-metal section. M.V.E.i. 10:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

References needed
Hello :-)

You have made two statments in the Russian rock article: 1) Folk rock music had a revival following Pelagea's and Melnitsa's rise from underground acts to constantly radio-aired bands. 2) The undeground pagan metal scene, based on Slavic pagan traditions, has grew wide with such bands as Temnozor, Arkona and Butterfly Temple being noted by auditory outside Russia.

Could you please give me references that could be used to support those claims? It's just that i'm now in a process of referencing the article so no-statement could be deleted. M.V.E.i. 15:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Master thrashmet band.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Master thrashmet band.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Melnitsa onstage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melnitsa onstage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Melnitsa photo by Evgeny Stukalin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melnitsa photo by Evgeny Stukalin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gorky Park album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gorky Park album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cadderly Bonaduce
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cadderly Bonaduce, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 09:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Aria 1986.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Aria 1986.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade 19:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of longest reigning monarchs of all time
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of longest reigning monarchs of all time, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of longest reigning monarchs of all time. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kipelov_band.JPG
I have tagged Image:Kipelov_band.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Vladimir Putin
Hello Garret B. The 'prime minister-designate' thingy is back, on Putin infobox & succession box. Electrobe has re-inserted it. GoodDay (talk) 15:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC) He won't relent. He's re-added prime minister-designate & (so far) isn't discussing it at the Putin talk-page. Though I'm AGF, he's behaviour (IMHO) is bordering on uncivil. GoodDay (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanx. I hope Electrobe will understand he was wrong. Garret Beaumain (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

PS: I hope I'm wrong, but I get the impression that Electrobe won't discuss it, as long as his edit isn't reverted. GoodDay (talk) 21:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, fear not. I've reverted it. --G2bambino (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Mavrik_and_Berkut.jpg
I have tagged Image:Mavrik_and_Berkut.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Aria (band)
Category:Aria (band), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon (Talk) 23:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Epi-Livin'-in-Twilight.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Epi-Livin'-in-Twilight.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Epi-Volya-k-Zhizni.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Epi-Volya-k-Zhizni.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Epi-Na-Krayu-Vremeni.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Epi-Na-Krayu-Vremeni.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Epi-Zagadka.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Epi-Zagadka.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

2008 South Ossetia War
Please be sure to use a meaningful edit summary with each edit - especially in a contentious article as this. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I will do, where possible. Excluding minor edits, of course.:^-)Garret Beaumain (talk) 01:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7
Hi there! :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for invitation. I'll look there.Garret Beaumain (talk) 17:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Good deal - thanks in advance for any help you can offer. :) BOZ (talk) 17:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Genre field
They're not listening to anyone at this point. But don't worry, I've planned to take this to higher people. They made a speedy change to the template without considering how others felt about it, and it's not right. By the way, if the situation ever arises (and it probably will) would you be willing to voice your concern of this change? Oran e  (talk)  18:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I hope this problem will be solved and I'm ready to help to solve it in any way. Perhaps, some criteria for inclusion of genres, or a rule of larger term (Rock, Pop) would be a compromise. But I sure, removal is a fault. Thank you for your participation in this point. Garret Beaumain (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Renewed discussion about the EU entry in List of countries and outlying territories by total area
Hi,

I'm contacting you because you participated in the discussion about the EU entry in List of countries and outlying territories by total area in the past. So I concluded that you might be interested to know that two editors currently push for a change in the article structure that is in conflict with the standing consensus resulting out of our past discussion.

The consensus was to include the EU entry in the initial text of the article, but not in the actual table (even unnumbered). — Whereas the change that is currently pushed would result in moving the EU entry to the very end of the article, even after the references/sources table. The result can be seen here:.

The standing consensus was not my favorite solution, as I would like to include the EU into the very list (unnumbered), but I content myself with the standing compromise. Whether you agree to or oppose the change, I strongly feel that the article's structure should not be changed without a proper discussion and maybe even a new vote before changing the standing compromise. You might want to give your point of view in the current discussion at
 * Talk:List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area

Cheers and take care, MikeZ (talk) 14:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Aria-live-18-11-03.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aria-live-18-11-03.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Same for File:Aria live show.jpg. --Sherool (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Drizzt Do'Urden
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Drizzt Do'Urden, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) BOZ (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

interwiki
Could you please explaine this edit?A feral organism is one that has escaped from domestication and returned, partly or wholly, to its wild state. But article in Russian wiki is about animals that live in city and have not owner.Rlu (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your attaсks on the russian page were condemned by russian wiki society. If you try to continue them there, it will be just the same.--Garret Beaumain (talk) 18:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This is not true. Nobody argue against my statement regarding wrong wiki. You stated that interwiki is correct, but you did not proof it.Rlu (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Grieg's music in popular culture
Thank you for the additions and citations. Bearian (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That's Okay. I was writing russian article for In the Hall of the Mountain King, and used some information from english segment.

A suggestion, Peer Gynt suite in popular culture is so large that it may be split to separate article. Garret Beaumain (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

You might be interested in this
Sockpuppet_investigations/Ada_Kataki.

Cheers. --Bardin (talk) 15:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I really suspect this is the same person that not only Ada Kataki, but also User:Breathtaker.Garret Beaumain (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Editing survey
Hi Garret Beaumain. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University in the United States. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic current events articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed in the talk page archives at 2008 South Ossetia war that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below. An explanation of my project is included with the survey.

Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kLMxj8dkk_2bls7yCBmNV7bg_3d_3d

Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Chorny Obelisk.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chorny Obelisk.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 71.176.83.93 (talk) 02:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Repost of Rocker jacket
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Dbratland (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Vit Churkin.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Vit Churkin.JPG I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 13:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, di-no permission was the template I was searching for.Garret Beaumain (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Melnitsa-Doroga-Sna.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Melnitsa-Doroga-Sna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Melnitsa-Master-ot-Mill.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Melnitsa-Master-ot-Mill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Melnitsa-Pereval.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Melnitsa-Pereval.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Melnitsa-Zov-Krovi.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Melnitsa-Zov-Krovi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Disco-Pop AfD
Hi. When you file an AfD, the actual deletion discussion page has to be more than just the reason and your signature - it needs to be formatted with the



template. It's explained at WP:AFD; there is a useful short-cut method you get to by clicking on "Preloaded debate" in the AfD template after you put it on the article. I have sorted out the Articles for deletion/Disco-Pop page for you. One of the extras that template puts on the page is a set of search links to look for sources - I haven't time to follow up, but a quick click on them suggests that, though the present article is pretty empty, the term may be in use enough to be the basis of an article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for adding the template I was insuccessfully searching for. As for the article, it just puts two words together and pretends it is a genre. It is not actually a term.Garret Beaumain (talk) 12:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Batareyka
Hello Garret Beaumain. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Batareyka, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to creative works. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Leaves' Eyes, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. GunMetal Angel 19:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "Welcome" - You're kidding me? ;) I'm a constant contributor since 2006.

Goth metal is not referenced anyway, therefore, ANY genre there is OR. Why do you stick to the more contraversional one? It is well known that "gothic metal" often used as a mislabel. And there are hundreds of reviews to describe Leaves Eyes as Symphonic metal. , among others. Some reviews do say "sympho/goth", and there's the reason for "gothic metal" addition in the infobox. But there's still their Napalm Records label page, which does not even mention Goth tag, instead, it says "symphonic rock/metal". Which is more believable than media-misused "gothic", that appears for almost every female-fronted metal band. I hope you will be satisfied with this explaination of my edit. Garret Beaumain (talk) 08:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Berlin, Palast der Republik, Bulat Okudshawa.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Berlin, Palast der Republik, Bulat Okudshawa.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:45, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Your nomination for deletion of – Russian techno
Just a note, you did not transclude this article in the Articles for deletion log page when you nominated it for deletion, as required in step 3 of the subsection "How to nominate a single page for deletion” on the Articles for deletion page. In the future, please follow all of the required steps when nominating an article for deletion. Thank you. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:36, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Another user has transcluded the article for you. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:58, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Ethnic Russian music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalinka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Nashestvie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Yefremov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Ivan the Terrible, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yadegar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Perumov-Cherep1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Perumov-Cherep1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Perumov-Cherep2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Perumov-Cherep2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't object its deletion. I uploaded this images long ago for just decorative goals, when I was not familiar with Wikipedia Fair Use rules.Garret Beaumain (talk) 13:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. When you recently edited Russian literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Volkov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. When you recently edited Alisa Selezneva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Peretz (TV channel, Russia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Images
Здравствуйте! Насчет этих фото. Думаю, нужны какие-то иллюстрации в статье, которые показывают, что СССР был анти-националистиечкой, интернационалистской страной. На фото показано уничтожение такого национального символа, как Храм Христа Спасителя и снос памятника Столыпина, который в политическом спектре был близок националистам. То есть фото имеют отношение к теме статьи "от обратного", они показывают анти-национализм. --DonaldDuck (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Не считаю, что они показывают антинационализм. Это просто снос зданий и памятников, связанных со старым режимом, враждебным новому. Точно так же их сносили по всей Восточной Европе при смене власти в 1980-е.Garret Beaumain (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Но если старый режим был национальным, или сносятся памятники связанные именно с националистическими элементами старого режима? Памятники Столыпину или Скобелеу снесли потому что они принадлежали к старому режиму или потому что были националистами? --DonaldDuck (talk) 03:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Старый режим был монархическим. И разумеется, памятники царским министрам снесли отнюдь не потому, что большевики якобы "ненавидели русский народ", а потому что монархисты были врагами большевиков, сторонников республики. А уж Столыпин в частности повесил немало участников революции, так что судьба его памятника примерно такова же, как судьба памятника Дзержинскому, когда либералы пришли к власти. Garret Beaumain (talk) 04:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian films of 2007, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Elusive Avengers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cultural depictions of Alexander the Great, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thais (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian science fiction and fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plutonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Belyayev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Science fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planet of the Apes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul I of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian science fiction and fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fish-out-of-water (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Alexandrov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vokrug sveta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geographic magazine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian science fiction and fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Howard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Your recent editing history at Russian jokes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You might want to consider this essay when editing articles. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I am a Wikipedian since 2006, I know the rules perfectly. And I know what Wikipedia should not include. The very addition of this joke should have been reverted in first place. Garret Beaumain (talk) 20:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As mentioned in my edit summary, there is no more racism in this particular joke than in the other ones... other than in your head. This is why I recommended reading this essay. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Elven Manuscript.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Elven Manuscript.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Norse exploration of the Americas
Template:Norse exploration of the Americas has been nominated for merging with Template:NorseAmerica. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Amorphis
Amorphis' genres aren't ambiguous. They're not unclassifiable, they're just generally around progressive metal, folk metal and melodic death metal.

And calling it simply "metal" doesn't make Amorphis' music easier to understand, on the contrary. Because that could have included alternative metal, rap metal, black metal (and its subgenres), thrash metal, drone metal, funk metal, glam metal, industrial metal, groove metal, nu metal, funk metal, glam metal, post-metal, sludge metal, power metal, avant-garde metal, etc.

I mean, Steel Panther, Limp Bizkit and Within Temptation are also what we could call "metal" bands, in the generic sense. But apart from that, they have nothing to do with each other. SP are glam, LP are nu / rap / alternative, WT are symphonic.

So, okay, Amorphis are a metal band. But what kind? Like I said, generally the first three cited. For someone who would like to know precisely, it's way better, and subgenres are there for that. Certainly they practice these genres in their own way, but, again, they're not a kind of indefinable band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.161.16.235 (talk) 11:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aria-Mania.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aria-Mania.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

"Moscow-Сity" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Moscow-Сity. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  dud  hhr  Contribs 08:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Iskusstvo Kino
Will you add any source to justify the category you have added? Otherwise, your edit would be deleted. Egeymi (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Magazine's official site reported they cease printed publications
 * Magazine's chief editor announced it in december 2022.--Beaumain (talk) 06:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)