User talk:Garrett wassenhove OMS 2.0

November 2016
Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:9D86:3AB7:D6A4:A0CE. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Garrett wassenhove OMS 2.0 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:9D86:3AB7:D6A4:A0CE (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Garrett wassenhove OMS 2.0


A tag has been placed on User:Garrett wassenhove OMS 2.0, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2602:306:3357:BA0:9D86:3AB7:D6A4:A0CE (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because i am a class clown and i am trying to be funny.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. Wikipedia would not be the place to "be funny", even if the nonsense you posted were funny. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)