User talk:Garry Birring

The remaining rules are probably similar to those used in the Indian game described above, but unfortunately I do not have full details. I know that all the cards are dealt, that houses (builds) must have a value of at least 9, and that sweeps are possible. Dave Barker tells me that the score for a sweep is the value of the capture value of the card played - for example if you used a jack to take all the cards from the table you would score 11 points for the sweep. I would guess that the target score for a game is less than 100 - maybe 30. I would be interested to hear from anyone who can tell me more about this version of Seep.

Copyright problems with Seep_(card_game)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Seep_(card_game), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pagat.com/fishing/seep.html. As a copyright violation, Seep_(card_game) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Seep_(card_game) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Seep (card game) and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Seep (card game) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Seep (card game).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Birring


The article Birring has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni↑talk↓  14:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Birring for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Birring until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)