User talk:Garryjenkins

Your link additions to 1970 FIFA World Cup
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Brazil national football team has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bbeautifulteam\.net\b'.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:3+1 plan cover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:3+1 plan cover.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Brett.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brett.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brett.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Brett.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Is there a vested interest?
Just doing some checking. Do you have a vested interest in these articles It is not usual for that level of interest to be taken in such detail. Thanks. 112.213.156.24 (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The People's Book Prize (UK)
 * The 3+1 Plan
 * Brett Alegre-Wood
 * Your Property Club


 * This seems like a perfectly reasonable question in the circumstances, and one worthy of an answer. Not addressing such reasonable questions lends further suspicion to motives. — billinghurst  sDrewth  00:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Sorry not to get back to you more quickly. I have been away on Easter vacation. I'm a fairly successful author myself and am intending to build a series of biographies and profiles on books and authors that I think deserve more recognition and widespread acknowledgment. I realise that my idea of what deserves recognition may differ from Wikipedia's so I read very carefully the notable persons criteria. As a result, in building this first profile of Alegre-Wood and his prize-winning book, I constructed it in a way that met those criteria. I am going to do the same thing for Lesley Thomson and Adam Perrott the other unheralded winners of the People's Book Prize. I will then move on to other authors whom I consider meet the criteria. Have I done something wrong? I have no vested interest in Mr Alegre-Wood or his book nor the People's Book Prize. I don't monitor my wikipedia mail often but will keep an eye out for a reply. Can I add a re-direct from 'My Talk' to my personal email? Best, Garry Jenkins 16:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh, and regarding my level of interest in detail, I have come to wikipedia from google's knol experiment where I constructed many pages which have a very high level of detail. If it's any help you can check them out here http://knol.google.com/k/garry-jenkins/-/19tjln1ywaolr/0#knols... This might be a good example to look at: http://knol.google.com/k/the-dog-its-origins-evolution# Thanks again, Garry Jenkins Garryjenkins (talk) 16:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Restoration of an article
Restoring a previously deleted article is a very simple process. Most admininistrators will restore articles they deleted if asked. Just provide some evidence as to why the delete rationale is no longer valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC) OK. Thanks very much for that. grj1958 (talk) 22:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The People's Book Prize (UK) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The People's Book Prize (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The People's Book Prize (UK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Brett Alegre-Wood for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brett Alegre-Wood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brett Alegre-Wood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The 3+1 Plan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 3+1 Plan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The 3+1 Plan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:3+1 plan cover.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:3+1 plan cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)