User talk:Garston

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Garston! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Montague Davenport -

Proposed deletion of Montague Davenport


The article Montague Davenport has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability concerns. Who's Who isn't (depending on which one) considered a reliable source via WP:RS.  Searches for reliable sources on this individual include a book by the subject himself, and a passing reference to him being director of the water company. In particular, the primary claim of notability (COMSEC) is not something that has any verifiability in any source I can get my hands on.  Reliable, secondary sources welcomed, as always.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j &#9883; e decker talk  23:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Montague Davenport for deletion
The article Montague Davenport is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Montague Davenport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j &#9883; e decker talk  23:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)