User talk:GaryColemanFan/Archive 6

UK Kid
I just thought you might be interested in knowing that I am working on improving the UK Kid article. See, I did notice that you were looking to help expand the article in the future. Afkatk (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've published the work I've been able to do so far and there are a lot of improvements which can be made in future though for whenever you decide to pick up the project. Afkatk (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps update
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am contacting you because you have contributed or expressed interest in the GA sweeps process. Last month, only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process with 163 articles reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

All exempt articles that have reached FA status have now been moved to a separate section at the end of the running total page. I went through all of the members' running totals and updated the results to reflect the move. As a result your reviewed article total may have decreased a bit. After removing duplicate articles and these FAs, the running total leaves us at ~1,400 out of 2,808 articles reviewed.

If you currently have any articles on hold or at GAR, please consider concluding those reviews and updating your results. I'm hoping that this new list and increased efforts can help us to increase the number of reviews. We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you know of anybody that can assist please direct them to the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, will get an award when they reach that mark. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

RE: Stephanie McMahon
Yep. That'll work. I added it back. Nikki ♥  311  21:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Hall of fame help
I would love to help out, but I am on vacation right now and do not have the books with me. the sources for their real names should be on the article for each of them, it is the Hall of Fame tag team book. I cannot help you with the titles right now I am afraid. MPJ-DK (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Stub reduction drive

 * I agree with Nici as well.-- Will C  08:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey can you come up a good DYK for this (still underconstruction) because I can't?-- Will C  06:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Idea
Have you ever thought of moving the title history of the IWGP Heavyweight Championship to a list and then expanding the championship article to GA?-- Will C  04:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Wrestling Observer Newsletter Hall of Fame
Reference 206, has nothing in it, I don't know what you were planning to put in there but I thought I might let you know it's an empty ref. Afkatk (talk) 10:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of PWG World Tag Team Champions/archive1
Your comments at the above FLC have been addressed.-- Will C  04:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps June update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York)
County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York), which you passed as a good article, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Articles for deletion/County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York). Cunard (talk) 17:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Peter Stilsbury
Consensus was to delete. Cirt (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll think it over. One option would be for me to restart a new AfD, as you suggested in the bottom comment at the AfD page. Would that be alright with you? Cirt (talk) 16:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Question
What is it between you and User:ECW500? Everytime he creates a supposed sock, he leaves a message on this page about Fruity Pepples. It is weird.-- Will C  15:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Well we have something is common, I'm now one of his targets. I feel so loved. He seems to have alot. from looking at his latest sock edits.-- Will C  04:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, how did the ref for the Pro Wrestling Illustrated: 2008 Wrestling Almanac & Book of Facts get into the IWGP Heavyweight Championship? If you have the book, could you tell me if it says anything about the JAPW Heavyweight Championship, the MCW Heavyweight Championship, the OVW Heavyweight Championship, or the AWA World Heavyweight Championship?-- Will C  04:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, do you know of anyone on here with the 98 version? Well anyone with some title history books? Indy titles and some old ones as well have alot of problems when it comes to references and I don't plan to stop trying to get some more FLs.-- Will C  04:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Title references
I'm sorry I totally forgot to check this out when I came back from vacation, here you go with complete citation template and all, if you need more I promise to be a bit more on the ball ;) . MPJ-DK (talk) 02:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * AWA Southern Tag Team Championship (also known as the NWA Southern Tag Team Championship (Mid-America version))


 * NWA World Tag Team Championship (Mid-America version),


 * the Boston-based American Wrestling Association's World Heavyweight Championship (promoted by Paul Bowser),


 * WCCW/WCWA World Six-Man Tag Team Championship (also known as the NWA World Six-Man Tag Team Championship (Texas version))


 * UWA World Lightweight Championship


 * UWA World Middleweight Championship.

It's not a problem at all, I'm just sorry I forgot about it and hey anything for someone who actually works constructively on improving wrestling articles, big thumbs up for that :) that article is very interesting and you've pointed me towards a new potential source. My hope is to get all the Kangaroo related article up to at least GA but I've been struggling on Heffernan as I have practially nothing on his non-kangaroo career or private life. And anything you need it just lemme know. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Report
Your conduct has been reported to WP:ANI. TaintedZebra (talk) 06:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Re the above ANI. Thank you for bringing the "recruiting" issue to our attention. As a friendly observation, when you are the subject of an ANI it is best to not make commentary, as it often only inflames the matter. If there is something you wish the admins to look at (as in this case), please just speak to us and not to the disputing party. Regards Manning (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps July update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 290 articles were swept in June! Last month was our second most successful month in reviewing articles (after May). We are currently over 70% done with Sweeps, with just under 800 articles left to review. With nearly 50 members, that averages out to about 15 articles per person. If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. This may sound difficult, but if everyone completes their reviews, Sweeps would be completed in less than two years when we first started (with only four members!). With the conclusion of Sweeps, each editor could spend more time writing GAs, reviewing at the backlogged GAN, or focusing on other GARs. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Requests part 2
I'll have a look, but I already gave you the Mid-America version of the NWA World and AWA Southern last time round ;) MPJ-DK (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Central States version of the NWA World Tag Team Championship (active in 1960)
 * (Kansas & Western Misssouri) WEST MISSOURI: World Tag Team Title P.253
 * Good thing you said George & Sandy Scott you'd gotten the wrong tag team title


 * 1) Mid-Atlantic version of the NWA Southern Tag Team Championship (later replaced by the NWA Atlantic Coast Tag Team Championship)
 * (Carolinas) CHARLOTTE: NWA Southern Tag Team Title [Jim Crockett] p. 114


 * 1) NWA Georgia Tag Team Championship
 * (Georgia) ATLANTA: NWA Georgia Tag Team Title p. 142-143
 * This one lists May 29, 1974 as the day the Andersons won the title.


 * 1) NWA Women's World Tag Team Championship (if you could also clarify how many times Penny Banner held the title, it would really help)
 * I can't find this one, it's not listed with the main NWA titles, probably listed as a regional title and then I'd need to know the region to have a chance, I can't flip through 300 pages and just find it. wrestling-titles even refers to the Title histories book but I'd need to know the region.


 * 1) NWA Tri-State Tag Team Championship (also known as Tri-State version of NWA United States Tag Team Championship)
 * (Louisiana & Oklahoma) LOUISIANA/OKLAHOMA: US Tag Team Title p. 23211

Hope it's helpful. MPJ-DK (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Question
Hey GCF, I have a question for you, since you are able to find references better than I am for things like this. I wanted to expand some championship lists during the World Class Championship Wrestling and United States Wrestling Association era, however, I cannot find a source that states when/how WCCW (or WCWA as it was known briefly) became USWA. Like I wanted to expand the USWA World Tag Team Championship article but the creation of this title came after the USWA renamed the WCWA World Tag Team Championship to the USWA Tag Team Titles, and the main USWA article says that the creation of the company came as a result of a merger between the WCCW and some other promotion and so the WCCW gave USWA some of its titles, I assume. But I'm having trouble verifying this. I was wondering if you knew of any sources for that, if not, thanks anyways :) Also, good work on the HoF lists :)-- T ru  c o   503 21:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help, I know its not easy, I've had trouble finding it all over the web.-- T ru  c o  503  15:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

I see
I understand and I know other sites that could be reliable as well. Anyway thanks for the tip.--Wrestling-fantic (talk) 22:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, bro.
I thought it would have been nice to reform a vandal, but I'd forgotten just how much hell you've been through. Believe me, I won't allow this to happen again. You need me, you call me. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

User:MarkMarkison
...has been blocked indefinitely. TN X Man 20:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:


 * T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
 * WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
 * WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
 * WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
 * WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 02:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Well Dunn help
I don't mind helping out one bit. I hope this is what you need. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * NWA Pacific Northwest Tag Team Championship, from Oregon's Pacific Northwest Wrestling; the title was held up on August 9, 1989 and November 4, 1989 and vacated in February 1990
 * Chapter: Oregon & Washington
 * Title: Portland; NWA Pacific Northwest Tag Team Title
 * Pages: 317-320 (monster list!)


 * AUgust 9: Not mentioned
 * November 4: "Held up 11/4 (November 4) after a match with Brian Adams & Jeff Warner, DOll & King win rematch 11/11
 * February 1990: The book states that the title was vacated when Doll & King jumped to the USWA


 * USWA World Tag Team Championship
 * Chapter: Memphis, Nashville
 * Title: Memphis: UWA Tag Team Title
 * Pages: 200-202


 * "Defeats Rex King when Steve Doll no-shows"


 * WWC World Tag Team Championship, from Puerto Rico's World Wrestling Council; the title was held up on August 1, 1992
 * Chapter: Puerto Rico
 * Title: Puerto Rico: WWC World Tag Team TItle
 * Pages: 324-325


 * "Held up after a match against SOlid GOld 92/09/01; Steve DOll leaves the area while held up; a match between King & Ray Gonzales and Solid Gold for the belts end with no decision 92/09/95; a second match ends in a double pin 92/09/12; Carolina, PR


 * NWA North American Tag Team Championship (active from 1997-present mainly in Tennessee; also known as the Music City Wrestling North American Tag Team Championship; on May 30, 1998, they won the title but Reno Riggins took King's place when Doll and Riggins attacked him after the match)
 * Chapter: Memphis, Nashville
 * Title:Nashville; MCW/NWA North American Tag Team Title
 * Pages: 204


 * Basically says what you said, attacked King and took his spot.

Thank you...
... for the help at Talk:Jillian Hall/GA1. :) Much appreciated. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

RE on AFD hold
Fine with me. I have my focus on a few other things, so don't worry. Take your time. As long as someone shows interest in improving an article I will not AFD unless I see it as a lost cause. I see them as having a chance, a small one at that though. So have a nice trip. They'll be here when you get back.-- Will C  06:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I tried to get these deleted last week, because they were hopeless cases and since the main article was speedied, I knew these would probably be soon as well, so the notification would have been useless.-- Will C  05:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * A promotion isn't established by who is in it. I looked for sources and found nothing more than Japanese sites and forums. It was a stub that had two championship articles. It had one line of text and a box with no important information. I speedied it under C7. An admin deleted it. Plus it was deleted before the discussion on telling people they were nominating anything.-- Will C  06:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I check goggle search. It may not have needed to be deleted, it may have been notable, but I was not aware of that. I'm looking through articles that seem to not be notable. I'm trying to do some clean up. Alot of editors I've noticed have been hired to write articles or have created articles that are not notable. Just trying to do my part. If anyone is willing to improve the articles I'm all for that. Not trying to cause trouble, just trying to make sure everything is notable.-- Will C  06:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * At the time I was 100% sure it was not notable. You don't have to "save" the articles. If they are truly notable they will survive the AFD or be recreated again one day. Don't blame me, think good faith. I'm just trying to sort through the articles that only a handful of editors even know exist it seems.-- Will C  06:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, I told you I would notify the project of any future deletion discussions beforehand and I have, but this time I thought it would be no use. If the promotion could be speedied then the championships shouldn't be notable either. Simple mistake. I agree with you mostly. But at times some articles should be deleted. I'm also expanding some of the articles. Just look at my most recent contributions.-- Will C  07:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Percival Pope
I think I fixed the wording issues and inline citations but I am not sure what my word count is. Could you take a look and see if I made it yet. --Kumioko (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to check on the status of this DYK and see if you needed anything else from me. --Kumioko (talk) 20:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry to be a pest but I was wondering if there where any other concerns on this DYK. I noticed that it was still out there with no action.--Kumioko (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I fixed a few more things so hopefully that will be sufficient. --Kumioko (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK rules
I replied on Did you know talk page. Follow up here with a pointer to the DYK rules for articles written in user space. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 20:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. I learn something new about Wikipedia every day. It is easy to run into new situations. Thanks for working on the DYK noms. That work is goodness for the project. :-) FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 21:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Philip Mawer
Thanks for the message about the DYK nomination for Sir Philip Mawer. I have now used the cite web template for the refs and some kind soul had already provided a ref for the knighood. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 07:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: John P. Charlton
Thanks for the heads up. I have cleaned up the partially removed entry. --Allen3 talk 19:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK concern
Greetings GCF! I think I have addressed your concerns regarding the Azm Palace (Hama). --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Question
Do you mind if I work on the IWGP Tag Team Championship? I would like to take it to FLC after a very big expansion in a subpage. I ask because you took it to FLC once before so I thought to check with you before I get too far into expansion.-- Will C  02:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Can I get an answer buddy? :)-- Will C  06:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Also I was not intending on criticizing you. I was just trying to give some advice on not trying to contradict yourself. Sorry if it came off that way. I've been feeling withdrawal symptoms all day since I forgot to take my anxiety meds for the pasted two days. I guess I hit the frustration phase. Quick note: Seeing as you nominated List of WCW World Heavyweight Champions for FLC in 2007, I thought to tell you I was thinking of FLRing it, but if you don't have time to work on it, I guess I'll hold off on it or if I feel up to it I may just expand it myself. Because God knows if it was removed I would probably just expand it myself and take it back to FLC in a month.-- Will C  06:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps August update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 215 articles were swept in July! We are currently nearly 80% done with Sweeps, with under 600 articles left to review. With 50 members, that averages out to about 12 articles per person. Once the remaining articles drop to 100, I'll help in reviewing the last articles (I'm currently taking a break). If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 19:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Misawa
Is it just me or is there alot of people who are bias against pro wrestling?-- Will C  15:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


 * What do you think so far?-- Will C  03:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, how did you find the names for the events in the IWGP Heavyweight Championship article? I haven't found a source any but a few.-- Will C  23:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I noticed it was down. I was going to try to prove it as reliable again, but once I saw the deadlinks I said forget it. But I did find a few refs for the tag title and a history ref for the heavyweight. Well thanks. The title is currently being sourced fully. Within the next hour I am placing it in the article and then possibly nominating it for FLC.-- Will C  05:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * While I was sourcing the tag title, I had the NJPW history refs translated, and I noticed they list the number of defenses per champion. Considering they can now be sourced, you might as well add them to the IWGP Heavyweight Championship since you are the main contributor. Sourcing complications and having to add the defenses is what has kept me from adding my updated version.-- Will C  03:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I just finished revamping the IWGP Tag Team Championship. The finished version is up and running. Check it out.-- Will C  16:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Canadian titles
I've checked the ESA North American title listing and it's even less detailed than what's on wresting-titles, I'd go with what the website states. And yes there is a record of the Global Tag titles, they're called the "International Wrestling Global Tag Team Title", they're on page 362 of the book in a chapter called "Atlantic Canada", Rudy Kay did indeed hold the title.  MPJ-DK  (No Drama) Talk 06:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Frances Oldham Kelsey
Did you notify any of the main editors of Frances Oldham Kelsey that it is up for delisting?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Double post
Sorry about reposting what you write, I just thought I'd refreshed the page and it wasn't there so I went ahead and added it. Tony2Times (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

waiting on SR 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)
I finished the stuff you put in the GA Res. for this article. Mitch 32(Want help? See here!) 16:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm pondering removing it, but I've heard User:NE2 is who added it, he could probably answer it. Mitch 32(Want help? See here!) 03:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I've gone ahead and removed the fact. Mitch 32(Want help? See here!) 14:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Dang it. Mitch 32(Want help? See here!) 19:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you do me a favor and get it fixed for me, because I am utterly confused. Mitch 32(Want help? See here!) 19:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hold on. I asked you nicely, and its because I am having a hard time understanding the problem, or finding it for that matter. :| - I went to the trouble of working on it, and its not even MY ARTICLE! Its one of the other project members and I did him a favor because he's too busy IRL. If you can't accept that no one's perfect, then you aren't helping things any. Mitch 32(Want help? See here!) 14:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Northeast Philadelphia GAR
I have other real life stresses this coming week, so I will be limited in what I can do on Wikipedia. I am hoping that others will fill in, and have left some messages to that effect. It would be very helpful if you would say what needs citations or other information to make GAR. I did several citations for political figures, but more could be added. Perhaps there are other sections that need attention. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Not wanting to drag this out at GAN...
Actually, I went to Malleus to double check that I had NOT missed something obvious. And to whine a bit, as I've had a really crappy day both on wiki and off. I've already apologized to Nosleep for being bitchy, which hopefully he has taken. My comment on Malleus' page was NOT an attempt to get him or someone else to review the article, it was (mostly) just venting of frustration over a small straw on top of a really long morning from hell. That's all. I'm sorry if someone saw this as an attempt to chase away reviewers, it was, as I said, something of a "argh, another thing is going wrong" type moment. My apologies to others if they were offended.Ealdgyth - Talk 22:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

An even, cool-headed question about what happened today
You said I agree with the nominator that the initial comments were outside of the GA criteria.

Are lack of depth and insufficient sourcing not part of the GA criteria? Nosleep break my slumber 01:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

List of WWE Hardcore Champions FLC
Can you revisit and address your concern? Thanks.-- T ru  c o  503  21:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Papal conclave, 1492
I've slightly corrected the lead, I think it now works. Perhaps it'd be better for GA to write a little bit more in the lead but I've got currently no idea. CarlosPn (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/IWGP Tag Team Championship/archive1
Care to comment here? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments. They are fixed, well one is left but the rest are done.-- Will C  16:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you know where I can find a ref for a weight limit to the IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship and the IWGP Junior Heavyweight Championship? I can't seem to find one.-- Will C  09:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure if you have seen this yet, but the reason I ask is I plan to take them both to FL. They are the only current IWGP Titles left that are not FL. Plus the Junior Tag is apart of a TNA Title topic I'm working on. I've checked a few places, but I haven't found anything. For something that should be simple, it is hard to find.-- Will C  05:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks anyway. I've been working on the tag in a subpage. Figured a way out that may work without having the exact weight limit.-- Will C  15:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Yeah, I forgot some of the images were fair use images. My bad. And yeah, I enjoyed the show, and I'm actually going to a second show tonight. Tonight, CM Punk will face The Undertaker for the first time EVER. EVER. I hope to get good pictures of that match. Is there any other type of picture the project would need?  Raaggio  14:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Attack
Just a heads up, someone created the account "GaryColemanFan's Mom", who then made this edit to this page. Another user reverted that edit, and I reported it at UAA. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 14:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I have decided to team up with User:theleftorium for the GA nomination of Bart's Friend Falls In Love. I have responded to a few of your suggestions on the talk page. Thanks. 03 md  22:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

GA Reviewing concerns
Please see. There are many reviews at GAN that do not perform a thorough sourcing check. Being one of the main requirements, verifying the sourcing is important. Please take note of what was brought up and please correct this in the future in order to help prevent such problems from carrying forward. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, in mixing up all of the names (too many Simpson articles starting with "Bart"), I went through and clicked the wrong GA page and put the notice here instead of the correct reviewer. Blah. The one review was really tiny (as you can probably see for yourself). It is bad when we have short reviews like that as they don't show thoroughness. Anyway, I'll be posting it at the right person's page now (it took me three tries to post it on the right article, haha). Ottava Rima (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Well Dunn
Here you go!  iMatthew  talk  at 15:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Anytime. :)  iMatthew  talk  at 16:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

TNA Bound for Glory GA results
Please see Talk:TNA Bound for Glory/GA1 for more information. Chris (talk) 22:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Article protection
Clobbered that IP just now. Let me know if you'd like for me to semi-protect some of his target articles. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Date format in footnotes in Well Dunn
Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers) says YYYY-MM-DD format is for use only in tables and long lists. -- Alarics (talk) 08:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The link that you sent me states that YYYY-MM-DD should not be used in prose, but it did not say anything about in footnotes. Currently, there is no policy or guideline opposed to this format in footnotes. There is a never-ending discussion, of course, but I don't see it being at all valid if most of Wikipedia (the other 10,619,575 accounts) have not been informed of a discussion that affects all of Wikipedia's articles. GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)


 * It says "However, they may be useful in long lists and tables for conciseness". That was never meant to include footnotes, where such an extreme degree of conciseness is never needed. The reason it has become a habit for some people to use YYYY-MM-DD in footnotes is because they see it in other footnotes, and that in the first place was only an accidental by-product of the date delinking/autoformatting saga - it was not meant to appear as YYYY-MM-DD to the reader, on the assumption (incorrect, as everyone now realises) that most readers would have date preferences set.
 * YYYY-MM-DD is ambiguous to many readers. It was designed for computers to read, not people. Even many of those of us who know what it means still have to stop and think about it, so it is a barrier to understanding. It saves only 7 characters at maximum over writing the date out properly. It looks geeky and is inappropriate for an encyclopaedia which is supposed to be written in English. -- Alarics (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

WON Hall of Fame
I posted this on the talk page, but I wanted to make sure you saw it. This year's inductees are: Everett Marshall, The Midnight Express, Bill Miller, Konnan, Roy Shire and Masa Saito. I was looking through the newsletter (I have a download link for those who are interested. I'm hesitant to post it here, but I can e-mail it upon request) and the inductees are split into categories: "World Wide", "United States & Canada", "Japan", "Mexico", "Other countries", "promoters", "managers", "bookers", "women", "trainers", "announcers". In the FLC for this page, I suggested that birth countries be included, but adding the categories as listed in the newsletter would be great. -- Scorpion 0422  14:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

accounts
Hi. I saw your note w/the stat re the number of Wiki accounts. Very cool! Where can I find that?--Epeefleche (talk) 07:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know problem
Hello! Your submission of Women Superstars Uncensored at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 04:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

WWC Television title
Pages 329-330 Section: Puerto Rico: WWC TV Title

That should be all you need for the book reference.  MPJ-DK  (No Drama) Talk 04:48, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

image removal?
You removed an image from Sarah Stock claiming that a fair use image could not be used in an article. That is incorrect, WP:FU defines criterea that the image must meet to be used in the article. The image meets all criterea except maybe number two. It is my belief that waiting for a free image that may or may not ever come is not in the best intrest of the encyclopedia. This picture will benifit the encyclopedia, the article, and does not infringe the rights of TNA Wrestling. Sephiroth storm (talk) 05:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Smackdown vs. Raw
Hey, thanks for the comment. Wikipedia doesn't have a deadline, but I think most people would rather just be done with the bleepin' GA Sweeps already. Fact is most of the other superbusy GA Sweeps reviewers have dropped to lower levels of activity in the task force or have stopped reviewing for the moment altogether; that leaves >300 articles to be swept by just a handful of people. If we ever want to be done in a reasonable timeframe (I'm aiming for the New Year as my high mark, but would reluctantly settle with 30 months, if you can call that "reasonable"), we've got to get these done. Given my limited time I simply can't wait around for everything to be addressed in a reassessment for every article I review. If there are small or relatively minor issues, I put it on hold; if I consider the underlying issues too severe to be reasonably fixed in a weeklong period—in the case we're discussing, I'm essentially suggesting an entire rewrite for comprehensiveness and accessibility issues—I simply delist. I try and fix some minor issues myself if I can, but honestly it's more time-efficient to let people deal with the issues on their own time (I've provided a general overview, and am always open to providing more specific suggestions if someone requests them) and then renominate at WP:GAN; I would hope the fact that the project temporarily loses a plus symbol in their assessments doesn't completely remove any impetus to improve the article. Hope I'm clear, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 01:51, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You're getting hung-up on a fairly trivial identifier. I'm not deleting my review, because it's entirely true—the article is poorly written and doesn't merit GA. The wrestling project can improve it from there; prove me wrong. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 02:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Idea
We are behind with giving out DYK awards. My idea is to give out some awards and deputise them to give out some more awards. Do you think that might work? Victuallers (talk) 11:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Dan Marsh
Since you were the one who expanded and referenced Dan Marsh awhile back, I thought you might be interested in SLAM!'s recent article. It references the article, and clears up some false info. Nikki ♥  311   06:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)