User talk:GaryHalfton

Start restoring the article immediately !!!! (Yr. Robert Lalkovits - Axone)

June 2021
Your recent edits to Yr. Robert Lalkovits – Axone could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

'''This is not a matter of debate and is not a playground. Please immediate restoration, restoration or re-edit the article. NOW!!!'''


 * Indeed. Your vandalism of the deletion discussion was also unacceptable. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yr. Robert Lalkovits – Axone, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 02:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Start restoring the article immediately !!!! (Yr. Robert Lalkovits - Axone)

June 2021
Your recent edits to Yr. Robert Lalkovits – Axone could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

'''This is not a matter of debate and is not a playground. Please immediate restoration, restoration or re-edit the article. NOW!!!'''

We have no idea since we have triggered it in you, to hurt Robert, but you so will be held accountable. This article has been unbroken for years, we have no idea who had an interest in ending it. Not enough space on Wikipedia??

Restore the original article about Robert or create a new article. It doesn't matter at all. Do something.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=robert+lalkovits

Block me fuck you, block if it perfect solution in this topic. How do you deal with your conscience?? Try out. Don't argue rather do something. Are you the editor or not? Restore article or create a new article. Do something as soon as possible. We are not editors, but we monitor and follow events. Please do not argue with us. Invent a workable solution. Thx!!!


 * The article was deleted per the consensus of the community. Based on the absence of reliable sources, I don't see where a new article could be created. I also don't see any impropriety in the deletion process, but you're welcome to discuss it with the deleting admin, and if you're unsatisfied with his explanation of the deletion discussion outcome, you can appeal the decision at WP:Deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Dear Fred !

We are not Wikipedia editors. But one thing we do know is that an article about an existing and worthy artist cannot be accidentally deleted and revoked. We have no idea who stood in the way of the article and why we should "tie into a live tree for everyone." Something should be figured out because this is by no means a solution, what the other editors did. Help us restore and protect this article. All information about Robert can be found on the Internet. This is simply nonsense. The article was here for years, and then one day it will be discontinued. Why? Are they bored? Let's have a solution. That's the point. Help us. Thx!!!

We don’t know anyone here, but we’re working at the record label and we noticed that the article was deleted and debated by someone without any prior notice. It was a completely unnecessary step. We should definitely find some usable solution because we don’t have time here to create and edit an article on wikipedia. We are also unaware of the options and regulations and do not want to be involved in this topic anymore. We all know that Robert’s musical work to date has gained great recognition and it is necessary to maintain an official musical biography and discography for him. That's for sure. He deserves help because he is a great person and a great artist. Our only request is for someone to edit a regular and acceptable article about it based on references on the Internet. Robert also has an official music page, which is available on the Axone.hu website, and there are plenty of descriptions of him on Facebook through various pages and groups. Someone take the trouble and write an article about it that complies with Wikipedia’s policy. We accept the help of anyone on the merits and will be tolerated in cash if necessary. We are available by email themsrecords@aol.com. Through this, they can contact us and if a good solution is found, we can discuss the financial implications of things. Please help us and there should be no discussion of Robert’s musical career and work.

BEST REGARDS, Gary Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yr. Robert Lalkovits – Axone. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Justiyaya (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * This is a very good time for you to review WP:PAID and the Terms of Use. Since you work at the record label, you fall within that category of paid editors. You've also solicited for a paid editor to assist with creating an article. (That action may taint any future creation of the article. Personally, it took me from "This is a topic which I'm not interested in researching to create a draft" to "This is a topic I will avoid creating a draft of, to avoid the appearance of paid editing".) Your comments above indicate that you are more motivated by your relationship with the subject than by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. As for the deletion discussion, it was duly posted for a week, which is the standard length of community discussion.
 * If you are unwilling to learn and follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines—which your comment above indicates—it may be in your best interests, and possibly the best interest of any future article about Lalkovits–Axone if he becomes notable in the future, to stop editing altogether. —C.Fred (talk) 11:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Dear Fred and Wikipedia Editors!

Again, we ask the editors to please use this attached information, take the trouble to edit a page for Robert, or restore the old article. Carefully review and research websites and links about the artist. '''

Links and references:'''

http://www.axone.hu

https://issuu.com/yr.robertlalkovits/docs/us_government_media_agency_contract?fbclid=IwAR0vUnLxTd47rKDWN6i3LCn8rhBjSlJiqZlyg-l7BXiMo3x4uChscI24JWU

http://www.last.fm/music/axone

https://www.reverbnation.com/axoneproductions

https://soundcloud.com/axone/likes

https://www.youtube.com/user/Axonee

https://hu.linkedin.com/in/axone

https://aboutus.com/Yr._Robert_Lalkovits

https://propeller.hu/tag/robert+lalkovits

https://dbpedia.org/page/Yr._Robert_Lalkovits_%E2%80%93_Axone

https://www.dailymotion.com/axonemiami

https://music.apple.com/gb/album/its-so-cool-single/1397987560

https://open.spotify.com/artist/12hKd26hTJrt9hOBGjzyPi

https://www.amazon.com/Mysterious-Corridor-Hossain-Robert-Lalkovits/dp/B01H0VEPRK

https://www.last.fm/music/Yr.+Robert+Lalkovits+-+Axone

https://www.flickr.com/people/32778265@N03/

https://www.boomplay.com/artists/1339139

https://www.tiktok.com/music/It%27s-so-Cool-6768694151299991553?lang=en

https://spinninrecords.com/profile/axoneproductions

https://musicracker.com/artist/5038757/axone

https://p e o p l e p i l l.com/people/yr-robert-lalkovits-axone

https://www.pscp.tv/AmeInc2Station/1dRJZZNyVYXJB

https://americaninternationalnews.blogspot.com/

https://hifimov.cc/videos/107/VDM131577808/com-new-m/axone-for-nelly-furtado-say-it-right-remix-clip

https://variousartistsusa.bandcamp.com/track/farah-hossain-robert-lalkovits-ghost-town-official-release

https://hu-hu.facebook.com/axonemediaenterprise

https://www.discogs.com/artist/207476-Axone

https://musicbrainz.org/artist/c17725c8-09aa-4cdc-be80-05a4e60a9aeb/relationships

https://www.discogs.com/release/1370263

https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/archived/soundquality/21-25-05-2007/3246016 Move page down and find Axone!!!

https://www.beatport.com/artist/axone/105368

https://www.mixcloud.com/MiamiSessionRecords/farah-babe-axone-mysterious-love-in-demijohn-original-mix/

https://axonee.tr-cam.com/

https://hu-hu.facebook.com/watch/Various-ArtistMiami-Session-RecordsGeffen-Records-318770691612010/

https://garyhalfton.wordpress.com/tag/yr-robert-lalkovits/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPcsupxJ-oE

https://vimeo.com/131577808

http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Yr.%20Robert%20Lalkovits%20%E2%80%93%20Axone/en-en/

https://www.metacafe.com/watch/990777/blackeye_lvety_axone_on_the_rtl_klub_monika_show/

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_It_Right - Say it Right (Yr. Robert Lalkovits - Axone Adaptation Remix) Axone for Nelly Furtado - Say it right remix clip (Grammy Award Winners)

... and countless more pages about Robert's musical work. Please make Robert a new article on Wikipedia from this information. It is not a matter of debate and there is no question that Robert is an existing person and famous. It is also known all over the world in the music and film professions. Don’t question its existence and art because it has no place and is indisputable. Robert is known to hundreds of thousands and millions around the world, which is just enough for his music and media work to deserve a regular article on Wikipedia. Robert is not a public figure or a stage performer. Robert is a professional studio musician, sound and video engineer and mostly works in the background, working as a background musician and studio collaborator in the music of renowned, famous musicians, bands and performers. Robert doesn’t have to be searched for and met on radio and TV shows, but he has to listen to his music and video clips, which is just enough to prove his talent and professionalism to everyone. Robert is a great composer, audio and video master, mixer and remixer in the music industry. Please review the links and think about this. Be kind enough to see and reflect on why they removed the article about him by what right here on Wikipedia. Neither he nor his musical work deserves this irresponsible and reckless treatment that some editors have initiated against the artist in boredom or reflecting his bad temper. Please sort out and set up a solution about him again on Wikipedia. Not because of you members of the Wikipedia, nor as an administrator, nor as an editor to carve out the lives of others, but to help showcase the work of artists and other famous people. Be kind enough to meet the real editors of their obligations and do not look for excuses and pins famous and prominent people's lives and not to hinder their appearance and biographical descriptions of them.

Thanks!!!!

Regards, Gary
 * You need to review the criteria set out in WP:MUSICBIO and provide proof from reliable sources that one of them is met. All I see here are links to the artist's music, social medias, user-generated content, music videos and self-published sources: not only are these sources unreliable, they do not demonstrate that any of the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO are met. Finally, please refrain from making personal attacks against editors: nobody owes you or your artists a wikipedia article. Editors apply the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO in an objective manner, and do not make any judgement about the artists who do not meet these criteria. JBchrch   talk  14:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)



These are all authentic sources. Don’t argue, do something. What are you a tribunal ? The solution is not to eliminate the artists ’page in Wikipedia, but to write, discover, and improve the page. 232 / This is your real job. There are 2 options. They write an article about Robert, or we file a lawsuit against themselves that they lose their hobby work not only on Wikipedia, but also in real life. This is what you are doing it is outrageous!!!This is your real job. There are 2 options. They write an article about Robert, or we file a lawsuit against themselves that they lose their hobby work not only on Wikipedia, but also in real life. This is what you are doing it is outrageous !!! Take what you want !!! You and you are not gods, just editors and their work is nothing more than a side job or hobby. Don't mess with us because they will regret it!!! All available information about Robert is available online. Someone create a relevant and acceptable article, or this conversation will never end and we will sue you and Wikipedia as well. This is not a playground for stupid kids, take note and they can’t decide who is important and what should be on Wikipedia. Robert is not a little scout and the documents about him do not contain any bad faith, obscene and outrageous things to make it out of place on Wikipedia. Please have someone write a suitable article because this debate will never end until then and we will put so much pressure on you that none of you will remain here as editors. I will add that you are blocking or sanctioning us completely unnecessarily, we will come back again and we will not leave until an acceptable and meaningful solution is found.It is not the objections and the controversy here that is the only solution, but the restoration of an existing article or the writing of another acceptable article. Work on this and think about it in the near future.  Did we understand each other??



 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JBchrch  talk  17:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You right to edit this talk page is also being revoked. If you wish to ever edit Wikipedia in anyway, you will need to go to WP:UTRS to request an unblock there. You MUST drop the legal threat to have your unblock considered. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)