User talk:Gary D

This user was active between May 2004 and February 2005.


 * Bye Gary. Wish you the best of luck. Keep in touch from time to time. &asymp; jossi &asymp; 05:11, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

I REALLY REALLY NEED YOUR HELP AND SUPPORT
See here for details: Requests for Comment/user 220.233.86.223 --One Salient Oversight 05:36, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you've left, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) July 3, 2005 17:52 (UTC)

Are you still around?
As you were probably the main contributor last year on these articles, could you please give a hand on Talk:Prem Rawat? Hope you are still around... &asymp; jossi &asymp; 00:22, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Category: British Hills by Height and Category:Mountains by_Elevation (km)
I am posting this to all the particants of the Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Books by title discussion and debate. (Where the categories were voted for deletion).

This earlier discussion has been cited as an example as to why the category Category:Mountains by Elevation (km) (and sub cats) should be deleted.

Could you please take a look at the following CFD and vote. Categories for deletion/Log/2005 September 1

A complication could be that Category: British Hills by Height seems be to liked by the actual British Hills content contributors. By contrast the category Category:Mountains by_Elevation (km) is not liked by User:RedWolf who seems to be a major Mountain page contributor.

Special note: the Ocean trenches by depth categories were added after the all of the people had voted. But frankly these have no real contributors and would probably get deleted if another vote was taken. You should specifically mention these to ensure there is no confusion in future.

ThanX ¢ NevilleDNZ 11:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC) ¢

Saving Kenneth Wapnick

 * Thank you, kind sir. Obe19900 (talk) 05:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Page footer


The article Page footer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this article has sat here for six years without being properly sourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Page header


The article Page header has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this article has sat here for six years without being properly sourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Kriya for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Kriya, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kriya until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wikid as&#169; 10:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Category:Christian liturgy, rites, and worship services
Category:Christian liturgy, rites, and worship services, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JFH (talk) 21:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Christian group structuring
Category:Christian group structuring, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JFH (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Flag salute listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flag salute. Since you had some involvement with the Flag salute redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Toddst1 (talk) 00:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Responsibility assumption for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Responsibility assumption, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Responsibility assumption (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)