User talk:Gary Dee

Thank you

 * Thx too. ;) --Gary Dee (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

---

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Thx. :) -- Gary  Dee  17:53, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

African Aster listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect African Aster. Since you had some involvement with the African Aster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Plantdrew (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For your continuous work on improvement of the Wikipedia

Mchan12345 (talk) 22:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC) 

Proposed deletion of Trojan:Win32/Agent


The article Trojan:Win32/Agent has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drill it (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trojan.WinLNK.Runner


The article Trojan.WinLNK.Runner has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Doesn't actually cover any specific topic. "Runner" is a bucket that antivirus companies use for "something that executes (runs) another file" that hasn't been classified. "WinLNK" is a Windows .LNK (or shortcut). So the title of this article is really just "A Windows shortcut file that executes a Trojan Horse in another file."

I thought about just proposing a merge, but there's no specific place to merge it to. A shortcut could be used by any Windows malware.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HamburgerRadio (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cypress Bayou


A tag has been placed on Cypress Bayou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MB 01:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation Artemis (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Operation Artemis (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

"Walter Rhodes (murderer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_Rhodes_(murderer)&redirect=no Walter Rhodes (murderer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Gjs238 (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Zwartbosch Private Nature Reserve for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zwartbosch Private Nature Reserve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zwartbosch Private Nature Reserve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Greenman (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)