User talk:Gary Sellars

Christian view of Jesus
Gary I appreciate your enthusiasm, you'll probably be a good contribution to this project. However we must keep in mind, that as editors, we are espousing what other sources say. Not what we say. We ourselves need to keep our opinions in check, and only report, like a journalist, what views are held by this or that group. In doing this we need to refrain from poetic and preachy language and try to stick to an encyclopaedic voice. For further information on this you can read the page at WP:OR. Wjhonson 05:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry Gary. I'm sure you are trying to abide by the standards of this encyclopaedia, but one standard is "personal opinions have no place here".  Hopefully you can understand that.  The "Christian views" pages is not for your own personal views, but rather for cited statements from reliable, secondary, published sources.  You can read the pages at WP:NPOV and WP:V to see what sort of things are allowed and not. Wjhonson 02:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Please avoid personal attacks as you did on 's talk page. You could be banned for words said against another editor. If you points of views, an environment that anyone can edit any page, including "homosexuals", then this project may not be the place for you. To introduce yourself more to wikipedia, you may want to try editing pages that are less controversial, or pages that you are not so emotionally attached to, at least for the time being so you can get the hang of things.--Andrew c 13:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought I was clear. Let me say it again. Since Wjhonson dishonestly and with a hidden agenda misuses Wikipedia (and no one appears to care to censure him) to promote his own politically correct agenda, I have no wish and no intention to attempt anything else here, since Wjhonson evidently exercises editorial censorship whereby scholarly approach is a distant second to his personal views of what agrees with his aforementioned politically correct agenda. I have no problems with homosexuals writing anything they wish, as long as it is in agreement with the facts. Unfortunately, as millions can attest, a great many of them have an agenda to rewrite history and change the face of our culture quite against the Judeo Christian standards that have prevailed in this country since its establishment. If Wjhonson's personal views are consistent with those who have the final decisions on what's approved at Wikipedia, then Wikipedia should perhaps add the tag, "Gay friendly" after "The Free Encyclopedia" since everyone except those who support the wickedness of the homosexual agenda do know and understand the words "Gay friendly" mean truth takes a back seat. Encyclopedias should have higher standards than to allow that evil agenda to color their standards of journalistic integrity. It seems to me at this juncture that this "encyclopedia" doesn't.

I thanked you for informing me of the rules and have no problem understanding that what I wrote would need to be heavily edited to comply with the rules that, to me seem equitable. However, Wjhonson has made it clear from numerous decisions that equitable rules aren't sufficient. Articles must pass his agenda also. That stench should be unacceptable to the powers that be, but my ignorance may be showing. He may in fact be the powers that be. If so, I will not waste my time and my efforts attempting to shed light where darkness is preferred. --Gary Sellars


 * Gary let me get this clear to you. I did not write this page.  I did not write it.  Okay ?  All I did was remove your preaching, putting it back, somewhat to the form it had.  So this page has nothing to do with my "homosexual agenda" whatever that is supposed to mean.  Again Gary I did not write this page.  I hope this is clear now, the third time I've said it. Wjhonson 00:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)