User talk:Gary Summer

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. . With your edit you have inserted your own POV, was completely untrue on many levels, and to top it off, you wrote a false edit summary. Don't do that again. okedem (talk) 11:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (Inserting POV). okedem (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

unblock|reason

It seems that if one does not have the pro-Israeli point of view, Okedem will take it up on himself to delete my message. Why is it that when someone says that artwork stolen by the Germans-Nazi's must be returned everyone agrees, but if one says, Israel must return the properties it has stolen, someone deletes the message. Seems to me, fair is fair. As I am new to Wiki, I am not well versed in all the do's and don'ts, but it seems to me that your opinion is just an opinion as is mine. What makes your view more worthy of being displayed, then mine? If one can say this person is controversial, can not another say they do not find them so. If not, what is the use of the Wiki. It can not be that the first to write something has the last word on all edits. I may have a view that some find controversial, but that would be a concept of perception. If you were Palestinian and someone asked if you felt it was OK for your family to have lived in a no mans land refugee camp for 50 years and to have lost their legally owned property, you would agree and not feel it controversial at all in saying you want what is yours back. I hope I have done this correctly, if not please point me to a better explanation of what I need to do. Sincerely, Gary Summer

Templates
Have a look at POV and disputed, which are templates that can be placed on articles, however placing warning text isn't allowed. PhilKnight (talk) 19:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)