User talk:Gaspardondine

July 2020
Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I noticed that you recently removed content from Georg Friedrich Schenck without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Jackmcbarn A lot of info about mr. Schenck is wrong. Or fake. So it must be removed

Gaspard Gaspardondine (talk) 05:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * There's a source cited. Does the page not match the source? Is the source wrong? Can you provide evidence to back this up? Jackmcbarn (talk) 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

A lot of the side is false. It's too much to explain about it. You can also find rightly info yourself Gaspardondine (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you don't want the material to be re-added, you need to explain it, even if it's complicated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

If it would be truly info. You can find the evidence yourself. It's easy. Or? Gaspardondine (talk) 05:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Afaics Gaspardondine's mainspace edits are mere disruption, e.g. changing "Evgeni Bozhanov" to "Evgeny Wosanoff", while no such name change has been established. --Francis Schonken (talk) 04:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)