User talk:Gateman1997

=Please Leave Me a Message on this page=
 * If you would like to leave me a message please either choose the correct open topic or create a new one at the bottom of the page.


 * For previous discussions please see the archive, archive 2 archive 3, or archive 4.

Ground rules

 * 1) No vandalism.
 * 2) Be civil. If you're rude I'll return the favor in kind.
 * 3) Sign your posts for the sanity of all.

'-

Calton
I see you have come in contact with Wikipedia's favorite know-it-all. Next time Calton comes around, please just give him one sentence and leave it at that, cause no matter how hard you try, you will never get through to him no matter how right you are. You will just be wasting your breath with him, trust me, I have. If you ever need any help with anything, please drop me a note on my talk page and I will be glad to help you. Rock on...SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 09:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's kinda the way it goes with him. No real edits, slams anyone making edits that he doesn't like, and berates them endlessly.  If you do, though, ever need help with anything (no matter the subject) please let me know and I will be glad to help you out, if I can't, I will find someone who can.  Take Care and Rock on...SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 20:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Calton has 10,678 mainspace, or "real" edits. For some history between these two, see Requests for comment/Calton.  The "outside views" provide interesting reading.  --Tractor kings fan  20:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well it's hard to tell. He looks like he's largely abandoned mainspace edits of late. And he's definitely abandoned WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, and WP:DICK. Gateman1997 03:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I concede your point on that. --Tractor kings fan  04:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Interstate 238
I 100% agree with you that it's not a parent of I-80. However, I don't think any of the five links are really helping your case that much. AA roads and the indigestion page do seem to explicitly state that it's not, but these are both roadgeek fan sites that aren't really reliable sources on the matter. The route log is just a list of routes in numerical order; it doesn't say anything about what's a parent of what. The FAQ-type page doesn't even mention I-238.

That being said, I think the burden of proof is really on the other guy. The article as it's currently written doesn't explicitly state that it isn't (or is) a child of I-80. If he proposes to include I-238 on 3di 80, he's going to have to come up with some source proving his case. -- NORTH talk 09:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:VeteransAbove.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:VeteransAbove.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Activity
You did not post an astersisk on WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. As such, you were considered inactive. Are you currently active in U.S. Roads? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Dude you're involved with a debate on I238 with me right now. Of course I'm active. I just didn't want the newsletter. Gateman1997 21:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

So Weird and Cara DeLizia pages
Regarding your revert of the So Weird & So weird page switch: I can appreciate the potential problems in leaving the history behind - it wasn't my intention to create new problems with the move. However, the placement of the article under the decapitalized entry has been a long-standing error. How would you advise fixing this inaccuracy without moving the entry to the proper page?

Regarding your edit of the Cara DeLizia page: May I ask for what reason you removed the "no free image" graphic? You left no explanation when you made the edit.


 * Thank you for explaining - I was, in fact, completely oblivious to the presence of a "move" feature. Do you really believe the move would be considered controversial, though? I've never seen any reference to So Weird sans caps anywhere outside of Wikipedia (not in print, on official sites nor fan sites), and I did look for a while to make certain - otherwise I would've done this some time ago, when I first noticed. --Adam the Alien 04:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I've sort of been following this today, so I thought I'd pop up here with a comment or two. I don't understand moves and redirects very well, but in principle I think the article title should be So Weird, because a) the capitalized version seems more common, and b) I've seen a few other titles go by in which the determination was that a lower case logo was merely a design issue, not the correct way to render the title itself. Perhaps we should bring it up on the article's Talk page and see whether there is much resistance to making the change. My experience with the article is that it's had the lower case spelling (inconsistently within the article itself, sometimes) since at least last July when I first looked at it. I'm not sure what the move in February 07 accomplished, but there used to be a note about a technical limitation preventing the article name and first two words from appearing as "so weird". Perhaps February was when that limitation went away? -- Karen | Talk | contribs 05:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah! Related question, then....
If cut and paste is inappropriate, does that also go for spin-off articles, or is that another matter entirely? For example, about two months ago I broke out The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (1947 film) from the article about the short story, because the film material was overwhelming the rest of the article. I then added one of those "see also" templates (For the 1947 film, see The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (1947 film).) to each article. Did I do anything wrong? -- Karen | Talk | contribs 05:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Cisco Field Image
I have a higher resolution image that you could use to replace the current image for Cisco Field, if you would like. It is the exact same image, just a larger file. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sdkucera (talk • contribs) 21:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

Stoopid Monkey Logos
As you are probably aware, the Stoop!d Monkey page was the subject of an AfD and the result was, of course, "Keep". Currently, the logos are a point of contention with myself saying that they were part of the "Keep", while User:Calton saying they were to be dropped and the article was to remain.

I asked the admin who closed the AfD his opinion and he replied, "I just said the article was to be kept, I don't know about the logos". There wasn't a decision given on the logos and in the AfD only 3 users said the logos should go, only 1 said keep the article, lose the logos.

I am not sure how to handle this, but since the admin who closed the AfD made no decision and the AfD wasn't about the logos in the first place (and the majority said to keep the logos if you want to be picky about it, as far as I can tell).

This wasn't an issue from April 16th (immediately after the AfD) to May 3rd when User:Calton realized that I was blocked for 48hours (not related to this) and I couldn't revert his changes. User:Calton had no interest and made no changes on the page itself or the talk page during that time. So, to me, his initial revert on May 3rd was done because of my block.

I have asked two admins (in case one is offline) to revert his changes and put a block on the page until this can be worked out. I am also asking you, since you contributed to the AfD, what your opinion is on just the logos themselves. I appericate you input one way or the other. Thanks...SVRTVDude (VT)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Familyreunion.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Familyreunion.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ports.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ports.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SJGiantslogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SJGiantslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 03:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ports.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ports.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 03:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:JohnThurmanAbove.PNG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JohnThurmanAbove.PNG, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

California-County-Route-stub
We're proposing merging this into California-road-stub at WP:SFD. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

USRD inactivity notification
You have been declared inactive at USRD. If this is in error, feel free to restore yourself to the list, but only if you are truly active at USRD. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grand west.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Grand west.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Familyreunion.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Familyreunion.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. MBK004 01:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

San Jose Earthquakes
Version one The San Jose Earthquakes, a professional soccer team located in San Jose, California,

Version two The San Jose Earthquakes are a professional soccer team located in San Jose, California

Every other football team uses version two, undo your edit so it looks like version two.

Happy editing, michfan2123 (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Your way doesn't follow the standard format policy, change it or eventually your decision will be overridden. michfan2123 (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whelen american.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Whelen american.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KCMUNI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KCMUNI.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:MaineRoute9A.GIF listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MaineRoute9A.GIF, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Popup estate cabernet m.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Popup estate cabernet m.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JLA-Cyberforce.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JLA-Cyberforce.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grand west.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Grand west.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2008 Fortune Market 250
An editor has nominated 2008 Fortune Market 250, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CiscoField1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:CiscoField1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Atlanticlogo08.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Atlanticlogo08.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Infobox logos
Whatever your reasons, please stop reverting, and take the issue to Template Talk:Infobox Stadium. I won't revert you again, but if you don't discuss it civilly, and continue to revert others, you risk getting blocked for violating WP:3RR. - BillCJ (talk) 06:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure if this is the same issue, but nonetheless...
 * The fact of the matter is that the infobox is starting to look too awkward. In Rogers Centre, the image of the stadium is actually obscured.  The differences in the proportions of different logos doesn't help either.  Logos like PNC and Chase Field may loog fine, but tall logos like Nationals Park and Minute Maid Park can be more problematic.  With the logo on the opposite side, the infobox looks much tighter.  There's no issue with the change save for the occasional small opening paragraphs which cause the table of contents to be moved over, but no introduction (blanking on the correct Wikipedia terminology here) for these ballparks should be that small anyway.  I'm planning on going in an straightening a few things up.  I was just trying to get all the logos done before I went to bed so I wouldn't get some guy who saw some ballpark logos being different immediately reverting the different ones.  Of course, I hadn't thought of football fields.  Nonetheless (yes, I used that twice in one conversation), I think the change is a positive change for the aesthetics of the infobox.  I wish I'd thought of it when I originally introduced the logos in the infoboxes, but I didn't. --The Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Football club infoboxes
I've created a draft new infobox for football clubs incorporating the features present in the MLS box at Infobox Football club2 (see User:Number 57/Toronto FC for how it displays). Please give your thoughts on WT:FOOTY. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  08:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've asked someone else to fix that (and hono(u)rs as well), as I'm not sure how to do it. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  16:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:QuakesUnis.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:QuakesUnis.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ChathamAs2003.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ChathamAs2003.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

One Circuit
Hello, Gateman1997. The Streets of Long Beach circuit map looks great. Could you do a map of Thunderhill Raceway Park? It's a road course that has five roadways to make different configurations. Thank you. Fclass (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Request to move article Monster Park incomplete
You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Monster Park to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:


 * 1) Added    at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article.  This creates the required template for you there.
 * 2) Added  NewName  to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
 * 3) Added  PageName  to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 19:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Mediation case.
Hello, I am Atyndall and I have taken on a mediation cabal case Roehl Sybing filed regarding Major League Soccer in hope to help all editors involved to solve your dispute. This discussion will be taking place here and I implore you to please add your opinions on the matter there, I will be researching the issue also but your help in the matter is greatly appreciated. Thankyou. Atyndall93 |  talk  10:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Baseball Newsletter
-- jj137  (  talk )  03:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Yardbarker
A tag has been placed on Yardbarker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Themfromspace (talk) 00:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:YBlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:YBlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:MLB team
Template:MLB team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — NatureBoyMD (talk) 00:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Testarossa Vineyards
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Testarossa Vineyards, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Merzbow (talk) 22:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Gateman1997/Systemwars.com
I have temporarily semi-protected the page at User:Gateman1997/Systemwars.com because it has devolved into a general attack page against members of that forum, which is against Wikipedia policies. I understand your attachment to it being your first article, but unfortunately its current form is not acceptable, even if it is in your user space. Either I can revert it for you (and probably semi-protecting it permanently would be a good idea unless you plan to watch list it) or delete it for you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Re your messages: No problem. I semi-protected creation of the talk page, too.  After I semi-protected the page, one of the new accounts shifted to the talk page.  It is rather bizarre that it attracted vandalism.  Perhaps it got mentioned on some forum and away they went. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Are you sure you want to do that? Since it appears to be a single account currently doing the vandalism now, if he keeps it up, he's going to get his account blocked.  -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Done. It's been create protected for awhile, too.  If you need anything else related to this, feel free to drop me a note. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Your user sub page
Hello there. I noticed that there were a lot of vandals attracted to that page of yours. I reverted some of those edits (I guess I should have reported it, although I had my hands full). Thankfully, the page was protected. Did I miss something there? ~ Troy (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Alright. It seems that a lot of socks suddenly messing up your page, and I just happened to come across it. Let me know if you need anything. Regards, ~ Troy (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem. But remember that he uses a million IP socks and manipulates different accounts. If he's blocked, I'm afraid that it won't do terribly much (consider getting help from a checkuser). ~ Troy (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, but I'm not an admin. As I said, I happened to come across it when I was searching for plain old vandalism. You could contact an admin, though. There's a lot of them (User:J.delanoy seems to be one of the more active ones that I know of). Good luck, ~ Troy (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Jarrett Bush
In my opinion blogs are unimportant and shouldnt be in articles--Yankees10 23:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * yes, I think that the external links should only have players websites and there stats--Yankees10 23:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AltamontRacewayPark.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:AltamontRacewayPark.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ALW-Uniform-OAK.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:ALW-Uniform-OAK.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:SBFC220.png
Thanks for uploading Image:SBFC220.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

BC Lions
No, I do not. In the near future, I'll summarize the history article, and add it to the Lions page. — Hucz (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

SJ
Fair enough, I wasn't aware of that. Hopefully I didn't create any problems. Cheers! -- Grant . Alpaugh  21:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:StLouisWPSlogo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:StLouisWPSlogo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter
-- jj137  (  talk )  00:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WashFreedom.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:WashFreedom.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ingamenow
A tag has been placed on Ingamenow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KCinDC (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

San Diego Freeway
Should this article stay merge with I-405. Since most contents on SD Frwy is I-405 stuff, control cities, and community serve, basic stuff we should try to avoid. We have too little to wirte of I-5, I know SD Frwy is both I-405 and I-5, is the FRWY I hail off of.-- Free way <font color="#0000FF">guy 22:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Answer this please.-- Free <font color="#0000FF">way <font color="#0000FF">guy 00:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AppIGN.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AppIGN.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Clancy Brown
Thanks for adding an image to Clancy Brown. It looks good. I've tried to find one but I've always been unsuccessful.--CyberGhostface (talk) 17:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BayAreaWPS.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:BayAreaWPS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:OACC.gif)
You've uploaded File:OACC.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 20:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stlouis wps.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Stlouis wps.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:KCMUNI.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KCMUNI.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

File:WomensProfessionalSoccerMap2009.PNG
Hello! I wanna use File:WomensProfessionalSoccerMap2009.PNG at ja:WPS (女子サッカー). Could you transfer it to Commons?--Ziman-JAPAN (talk) 23:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Bruce De Palma
You seem to be the only surviving keeper from Articles for deletion/Bruce De Palma. Did your assessment of notability imply, that you previously heard about Bruce De Palma? I'm looking to either address the pastel-shaded boxes of the article or re-nominate for deletion. What I'm primarily seeking now is any mentioning in mainstream media. I mean, if you invent a perpetuum mobile you would try to do some public relations and bring it to the press' attention. Any hints? --Pjacobi (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Washington Freedom 2009.PNG)
You've uploaded File:Washington Freedom 2009.PNG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 04:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Use of your User Page
Why do you not allow people to edit your user page? This isn't Myspace or Faceboot it's wikipedia. This is not neant to sound rude, I just wanna know. Standleylake40 (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

MLS Stadiums template
Why don't you believe the future MLS stadiums deserve mention? Tom Danson (talk) 19:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

WPS Map Update
Hi Gateman! Noticed you had done the WPS teams map all by your lonesome, and since I don't know how to edit images (especially those created by others) here on Wikipedia, I was wondering if you could update the map to reflect Athletica's move to the Missouri side of the Mississippi river - highlight MO, and maybe move Athletica's square down one square-height or so. =-) Thanks! CyMoahk (talk) 03:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:CBrown.jpg
File:CBrown.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:CBrown.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Traffic Lights 012.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Traffic Lights 012.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi
An editor that expressed concerns before now completely ignores the sources and wants to say which sources are valid and which isn't. This in no way helps with the wiki article. Please have a say here:Talk:Strikeforce Sea888 (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

JetBlue Airways and the JFK Airport hub.
Hi,

I have started a discussion at both Talk:JetBlue_Airways and in the WP:Airlines talk section in regards to the listing of hubs/focus cities for JetBlue Airways. I know your folks decided on a consensus 1 year ago, but consensus can change if people in the discussion has a strong argument.

Cheers. --Sb617 10:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

USL-1 stuff
Hey, how's it going? I noticed you have been making changes to the USL1 team list and some USL1 team pages following today's announcement that some of the TOA teams want to form a new league; I think we should wait until we have some more concrete information before we start making sweeping changes to the pages. TOA have only announced their intent to form a new league; it doesn't have a name yet, doesn't have approval from the USSF or the CSA to actually become a league, and nothing is finalised with regards to the league's detail, so we have no sources to confirm the changes. The fact that each TOA team page has a sourced paragraph outlining the 'intent to form a league' detail is enough.

Also, USL1 hasn't announced it's format for 2010 either, so we should wait until we can confirm which teams are in and out. Montreal might come back. Ottawa might not get their franchise. Tampa might jump to TOA. We have no sources to confirm what the 2010 USL1 teams will be, so I think we should wait until USL1 issues a formal press release. It'll only be a few weeks probably. --JonBroxton (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Great job on the TOA/USL1 stuff following the announcement today. It's all coming together nicely. --JonBroxton (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd say you can probably just overwrite the current redirect page at North American Soccer League. The hatnote at the top of the new NASL page will make sure there's no confusion. --JonBroxton (talk) 22:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There are around 2000 articles linking to North American Soccer League when they actually should link to the old article? This should be taken care of. --Papuass (talk) 11:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:QuakesStadium.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:QuakesStadium.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SJEarthquakesStadium1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SJEarthquakesStadium1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Apple Store Stanford Shopping Center
I have nominated Apple Store Stanford Shopping Center, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Apple Store Stanford Shopping Center. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BusterD (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of auxiliary Interstate Highways
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of auxiliary Interstate Highways. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of auxiliary Interstate Highways. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Image gallery
Please stop adding an image gallery to Carnival Elation. It is being removed per policy at WP:IG which states: "However, Wikipedia is not an image repository. The gallery tag is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved in accordance with the above paragraph or moved to Wikimedia Commons. Links to the Commons categories can be added to the Wikipedia article using the Commons category template. One rule of thumb to consider: if, due to its content, a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of [insert article title]", as opposed to a more descriptive title, the gallery should either be revamped or moved to the Commons. -MBK004 07:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Tonight Show
It is against WP:CRYSTAL to include what is referred to as "future history" in articles. We cannot add a range of (2009–2010) if the host is still hosting as of the present. We must wait until January 22 or 23 to add that Conan is no longer hosting the show. As for Jay's second tenure of the show, we must, again per CRYSTAL, wait until March 1 to include his second tenure in any lists. &mdash; CIS (talk | stalk)
 * We can add this information to the article body, certainly, as we have done. But we cannot add date ranges for events that have not yet occurred. Read point #3, the "future history" section, at WP:CRYSTAL. &mdash; CIS (talk | stalk) 18:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Beginning January 22 we can add a date range of (2009–2010) for O'Brien's tenure. But we cannot add Leno as a successor host in any "lists" (i.e. Jay Leno (2010–present)) because this amounts to future history. Posting dates for future Boxing events et. al. is a totally different matter, because it isn't a date range suggesting that the "present" is in the "future". We do confirm that Leno is scheduled to take over the Tonight Show on March 1 in the article body, but this cannot be used in any date ranges until he actually begins his tenure, same as O'Brien for when he ends his. It makes no sense to say "Jay Leno (2010–present)" when he's not even hosting until March 1. &mdash; CIS (talk | stalk) 18:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

FC in names
Hi. I'm not saying that we don't have FC in the team names - clearly we do. I'm saying we don't have it in the link piping. Like, we don't link to Manchester United FC, we pipe the link to Manchester United; we don't link to Chelsea FC, we pipe the link to Chelsea. It's always been standard practice. The only exception is on certain American teams where the FC part of the name is actually spoken, like Seattle Sounders FC, FC Dallas, and in the case of the NPSL, Tulsa FC and so on. --JonBroxton (talk) 17:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but that's my point. If you watch an MLS broadcast, Seattle Sounders FC is spoken as Seattle Sounders FC, so we pipe the link as Seattle Sounders FC. However, Chicago Fire S.C. (the formal name of the team) is spoken as Chicago Fire, so we pipe the link as Chicago Fire. We've always done it like this, so I don't understand why you're making an issue of it now. --JonBroxton (talk) 20:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

SFD
California-county-route-stub at Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/February/27. --Rschen7754 07:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox CA Co
Template:Infobox CA Co has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rschen7754 08:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SDBocaFC logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:SDBocaFC logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:18, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:240px-Atlanticlogo08.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:240px-Atlanticlogo08.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

San Jose Attendance
Thank you for finding a reliable source for the change you were making. In your edit summary, you pointed out that one could just add up the numbers and produce this result. That would be original research or synthesis at the very least. By finding the SI source, you ensured that this change would stay. My problem with your original change is that you were replacing a fact that already had a reliable source with a fact and a much less reliable source, so I reverted it. Now that we have a good source for the newer (more accurate) fact, all is good. Thanks. --SkotyWAT<sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">C 15:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

MLB infobox edits
Hi,

What were these edits in aid of? So far as I can see, there's no change to the output, but the code is broken. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Macintosh Revival
Hello, ! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Macintosh Role Call
Hello, ! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently being revived. Your help would be appreciated! To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. The role call will end May 31; please move your name now if you are still interested. For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! &middot MonoBot04:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Please support your statement on Talk:Vancouver Whitecaps FC. The fact is they are the same team as is evident from the fact that today's pres conference was held in the Whitecaps' office. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Yankees-Giants rivalry AFD Nomination
Hello. I saw you had put this AFD up. There actually already was an AFD nomination for the article and the result was keep. You may take a look at it from the page's discussion page if you wish. 161.185.151.150 (talk) 15:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CiscoField1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CiscoField1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

MK Dons
Hi Gateman. Can I respectfully suggest that you don't get involved with editing MK Dons? It seems to me that the wikipedia community has done a pretty good job of creating an NPOV entry for this sensitive topic. Thanks. Daveofthenewcity (talk) 21:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Out of interest, why are you concerned with this? From your user page it wouldn't appear that you are local to either Milton Keynes or Wimbledon... Daveofthenewcity (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes I live in Milton Keynes and support the Dons. 'Franchise' is sometimes used wrt to the Dons but it really is not a true nickname. Daveofthenewcity (talk) 22:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Well I'll leave it and see what others do. It's just it'll be a shame after reaching a pretty good compromise someone comes in from California and inflames things again!  Not that I've got anything against California or Californians mind you. I had a very enjoyable holiday there last Christmas - based on the Emeryville/Oakland border.Daveofthenewcity (talk) 22:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WUSA team
Template:WUSA team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:San Diego Padres Logo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:San Diego Padres Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Hollywood United Hitmen
The evidence is that I am the press officer for the Hollywood United Hitmen (my name is on the website - http://hollywoodutd.com/contact_us.html) and I wrote the press release that will confirm our division :) We're in the NW to even out the schedule, 5 teams in each division. Every team is playing the other teams in their division twice, one team from the other division twice (in our case SD Flash), and the other teams from the other division once, for a 14-game regular season. JonBroxton (talk) 23:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Tucson Padres, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In the reference provided, the use of the word "indefinitely" is not found anywhere in the article. Please remember that content in the article space that is not referenced properly by a reliable source, can be considered original research and can be removed. It is now your burden to support any additional statements about there not being a Ballpark in Escondido in the future with reliable sources. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Shibe Park infobox
Hi, Gateman1997. I'm not out to start a tussle over the statistics at Shibe Park, so I just wanted to give you my reasoning in changing the infobox: The term US$ is meant to provide a point of comparison of contemporary values of money — between contemporary US dollars versus Canadian dollars versus Australian dollars, (and I'm sure there are others). 1909 dollars, as in the Shibe infobox, are factually not US$s, because their 102-year-old value is incomparable with 2011 dollars. Also, the Philadelphia A's and the Philadelphia Phillies of the Shibe era were not MLB teams: their franchises were granted by the American League and the National League respectively. The fact that these two franchisors, independent corporations at the time, were folded into the Major League Baseball corporation in the 1990s, does not make the Shibe-era teams MLB teams. You can't be a member of something that doesn't yet exist. Cordially, — HarringtonSmith (talk) 20:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EarthquakesStadium.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:EarthquakesStadium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Seating capacity nonsense at Griffith Stadium
I'm sure you knew that the fellow who adds the long lists of seating capacities struck again a few weeks back at a bunch of park articles. I think this information is worthless, tedious trivia, but in the unlikely event there is some reader who finds it valuable, I didn't want just to delete it. At Griffith Stadium, I moved it all into a footnote to the mention of seating capacity in the text (it's footnote 7). This way, the information still exists in the article, but without clogging the flow of it. Users Delaywaves and Baseball Bugs are in agreement with the approach, and if you agree, then we might have a prototype for how to deal with this fellow. (You can answer here, I'll be watching.) Cheers! — HarringtonSmith (talk)
 * Seems a sound solution to me. I'll back you on this as well. Gateman1997 (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification (for Gateman1997)
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2012 San Diego Padres season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to FSN

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NLW-Uniform-SD.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:NLW-Uniform-SD.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

"Snapdragon Stadium"???
Renaming the article with the intent of reverting it 10 days from now? What's the point? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And by the way, if this announcement is still accurate, the name change does not even kick in until Sunday. This is stupid. Why not just create a redirect? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Because we can always move it back on the 28th. It takes all of 2 minutes to undo it at that point. And while short lived it is an official name change. They've taken down all the Qualcomm signage as of today and put up the new Snapdragon signage. Gateman1997 (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It is not wikipedia's purpose to act as a lackey for corporate whims. A redirect was the right way to handle this nonsense. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Then explain to me why we renamed Landshark Stadium during the time that venue was given that particular name during nothing but a corporate naming stunt? Gateman1997 (talk) 17:51, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * In that case it was a change of company and resultant change of naming rights. This is the just one company, playing games with the name to try and promote a new product. Its like if Citi Bank's New York ballpark were to rename itself "Special Deal on a Big Blue and Orange Giftcard for Christmas!" for the next week. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:09, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SnapdragonStadium.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SnapdragonStadium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

San Francisco meetup at WMF headquarters
Hi Gateman1997,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012

 * —  Imzadi 1979  →   22:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

USS Hornet debate
If the CV-12's recommissioning was only a ceremonial act, then why was their officers of the US Navy present, including a (retired) Navy chaplain and Navy reservists ordered to man the Hornet? Why did then the plankholders of the CV-8 and CV-12 present at the recommissioning the ceremonial ship's log and glasses? And if it was only a ceremonial act, why was an official commissioning pennant hoisted in proper manner? I'd like some explanation how much you know about the 1998 recommissioning ceremony. I've read the program from the ceremony and saw a video about it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jok13vWbOmw 68.236.155.234 (talk) 09:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Check the Naval Register http://www.nvr.navy.mil/nvrships/details/CVS12.htm. The Hornet is not listed as an active ship and still remains stricken. The ceremony you are referring to was simply part of the 5/26/98 ceremonial transfer to her new owners at the now USS Hornet Museum, nothing more. She has not been "recommissioned" in any Navy and is still properly referred to as "ex-Hornet" when talking about her in a commissioned vessel sense. You'll also note the Navy officially considers her "disposed", not "in commission." Gateman1997 (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of top goal scorers in Major League Soccer


The article List of top goal scorers in Major League Soccer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''redundant to Major_League_Soccer#All-time_regular_season_leaders

it even direct readers there.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koppapa (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:YumaPanthers.png
 Thanks for uploading File:YumaPanthers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Top Gear moves
Just FYI: I see you just moved Top Gear UK back; I did US just after you, and left a message about discussing moves and understanding American series terminology on the mover's talk page. --Drmargi (talk) 00:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Did you know ...
... that Chuck Norris won the World Series of Poker using Pokémon cards? <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—<b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 19:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Women's Professional Soccer stadiums
Template:Women's Professional Soccer stadiums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited San Diego–Tijuana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Del Norte High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Wichita Junior Thunder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wichita Junior Thunder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wichita Junior Thunder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

--ilamb94 (talk) 23:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

'Excess' at Milton Keynes Dons
The 'excess' was the information that Wimbledon previously played at Crystal Palace and the specific destination stadium is the Hockey Stadium. Both of these are excess detail from the lede section. I added that WFC went into administration: surely that should be in the lede - after all it is in the body.

So rather than the knee-jerk revert, tell me what specifically you didn't like about my version, which I believe is a tighter edit of what was there before: Milton Keynes Dons were created on 21 June 2004, nine months after Wimbledon F.C.'s relocation to Milton Keynes in September 2003 and its subsequent administration, rescue and renaming. Being in law the same business, MK Dons initially claimed the history of Wimbledon F.C. as its own, but stopped doing so in 2007, in part to ensure the recognition of its supporters groups by the Football Supporters Federation, which had previously boycotted the team. Since 2007, the Board of MK Dons has maintained that the club is a new one, founded in 2004. You reverted that back to the long-winded and pussy-footing: Milton Keynes Dons were created on 21 June 2004, nine months after Wimbledon F.C.'s relocation to the town's National Hockey Stadium in September 2003. Wimbledon had previously shared Crystal Palace's Selhurst Park ground, in an arrangement which started in 1991.

MK Dons originally claimed the history of Wimbledon F.C. as its own, but stopped doing so in 2007, in part to ensure the recognition of its supporters groups by the Football Supporters Federation, which had previously boycotted the team. Despite remaining a legal continuation of the original Wimbledon club, MK Dons have maintained since 2007 that it is a new team, founded in 2004.

How is that better than what I wrote? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I've moved this discussion to Talk:Milton Keynes Dons F.C. where my proposal already has support from a sceptic and respected editor. If you have anything to say, please do so. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

User vs. User Talk
Please don't write messages on a User's page, that's why there are User Talk pages, like this one! :) Thanks. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 05:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Jared Padalecki's page
I am aware that you will most likely retaliate to this message with a rather angry reply, but I am quite distressed at your inability to have fun. While it may be inconvenient for some users to have GISHWHES team names on Jared's wiki page, it is also a sign of your uncaring attitude to charities that you have locked down his page. I politely request that you allow ALL GISHWHES participants to post on his page for the 6 days (in reality not a very long span of time) so that we may complete our challenge and raise more money for Misha Collins' charity RandomActs. Upon the end of the event I will personally clean the page and ensure it is back to it's regular standard of information. On another note, I am sure Jared Padalecki himself would approve of our use of his wikipedia page for Misha Collins' event. I also appologise if my formating of this request is incorrect as I am new at editing Wikipedia Yours sincerely Faith Lavinia (talk) 06:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)FaithLavinia

Thank you for your reply. I have read the vandalism rules and have understood them. The suggestion made on Jared Padalecki's talk page however seems like a decent and encyclopedic entry. Encyclopedia is defined as "a book or set of books giving information on many subjects or on many aspects of one subject and typically arranged alphabetically" (google definitions) and "encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands" (Wikipedia entry on encyclopedia). These definitions suggest to me that an event such as GISHWHES is something that can be placed in an article, and therefore since the suggestion made by Sarah.J.Campbell is to create a new section on Jared Padalecki's page and it's inclusion in the GISHWHES list is "an aspect of one subject", this subject being Jared himself. I believe that the page should be reopened and the teams allowed to post in this new section. Thankyou for your time Faith Lavinia (talk) 06:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Furthermore I would like to direct you to one of the 5 pillars of wikipedia "Wikipedia does not have firm rules. Rules in Wikipedia are not carved in stone, as their wording and interpretation are likely to change over time. The principles and spirit of Wikipedia's rules matter more than their literal wording, and sometimes improving Wikipedia requires making an exception to a rule. Be bold (but not reckless) in updating articles and do not worry about making mistakes. Prior versions of pages are saved, so any mistakes can be corrected." My interpretation of this rule is that posting on Jared Padalecki's page should be allowed as the rules of Wikipedia are not set in stone and are open to creative interpretation. I thank you for your time and I am sure that my well worded arguments will be seen by all and they will agree with me. Thankyou Faith Lavinia (talk) 08:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I too am a GISHWISH participant. Given their friendship, Misha Collins- one of Jared's friends and colleagues from the show Supernatural, has marked his wikipedia page as a target, with the consent of Jared Padalecki. I will contact Jared to try to get his consent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gishwhes2012fcls (talk • contribs) 00:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but Jared Padalecki actually has no control over his page, so his consent is meaningless in this instance. Gateman1997 (talk) 00:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sports in San Diego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Del Norte High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American West Baseball League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Las Cruces (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheEpicenter.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:TheEpicenter.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Long Beach08.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Long Beach08.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2012Padreslogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:2012Padreslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 13:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Cisco Field for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cisco Field is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cisco Field until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 07:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:CiscoField3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CiscoField3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of San Diego iCon FC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Diego iCon FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/San Diego iCon FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ColinFine (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Global account
Hi Gateman1997! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SJGIANTSUNI.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:SJGIANTSUNI.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SDFlash.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SDFlash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flashlogo2011.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Flashlogo2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:San Diego Flash logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:San Diego Flash logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BostonBreakers.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:BostonBreakers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SkyBlueFC.png
 Thanks for uploading File:SkyBlueFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2005 Toyota Atlantic Championship season (logo).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:2005 Toyota Atlantic Championship season (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 11:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Gateman1997/San Jose Municipal Stadium
User:Gateman1997/San Jose Municipal Stadium, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gateman1997/San Jose Municipal Stadium and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Gateman1997/San Jose Municipal Stadium during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Gateman1997/San Jose Giants
User:Gateman1997/San Jose Giants, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gateman1997/San Jose Giants and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Gateman1997/San Jose Giants during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silicon Valley Comic Con, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PeoriaJavelinaslogo2011.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PeoriaJavelinaslogo2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sockerslogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sockerslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sockers Crest 2011.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sockers Crest 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FowlerPark.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:FowlerPark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Gateman1997/Cicero's Pizza (Cupertino, California)
User:Gateman1997/Cicero's Pizza (Cupertino, California), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gateman1997/Cicero's Pizza (Cupertino, California) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Gateman1997/Cicero's Pizza (Cupertino, California) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Calton | Talk 10:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPS Labelled Map
Template:WPS Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MaineRoute208.GIF


The file File:MaineRoute208.GIF has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, unclear use/purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Apple Inc.
Hello ,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.
 * RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Candlesticklogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Candlesticklogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Ring Central vs. RingCentral
Just a heads-up. The actual name of the company is RingCentral. On Friday, when the Commission votes on the name change, we'll know if it's one word or two.

Roberto221 (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:USLSDLogo2020.png
Thanks for uploading File:USLSDLogo2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Red Ryder (software)


The article Red Ryder (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article has zero references or citations. I made an attempt to do some research and try to find some references for the article, but I found nothing in my search, leading me to believe that this software isn't notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SebastianTalk - 19:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SiliconValleyComicConlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SiliconValleyComicConlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Women'sProfessionalSoccerMap 2009.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Women'sProfessionalSoccerMap 2009.PNG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

File:SeaDogsCapLogo.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SeaDogsCapLogo.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Replica 1 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Replica 1, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Replica 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:California League ballparks
Template:California League ballparks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)