User talk:Gatestone01

Gatestone

October 2013
Hello, Gatestone01. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gatestone Institute, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Please see Advice for editors who may have a conflict of interest. Mlpearc  ( powwow ) 14:34, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Apologies from the Wikipedia community
Please accept the apologies of the Wikipedia community, Gatestone01, for the hostile treatment you've received here. Some of our editors just want to apply policies without thinking. Technically, they are probably correct. I, however, looked at your contributions to our Gatestone Institute article and found them constructive (we are supposed to be here to build an encyclopedia and your edits did just that). Your edits were deleted, again, apparently on a technicality. I reviewed them, formatted them a bit and restored them because they are a positive addition to the article.

(You should change your username if you want to contribute further.)

Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! --72.66.30.115 (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)