User talk:Gatewoodandresye

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerges Zakka جرجس زكا (July 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerges Zakka جرجس زكا and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gerges_Zakka_%D8%AC%D8%B1%D8%AC%D8%B3_%D8%B2%D9%83%D8%A7 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gerges_Zakka_%D8%AC%D8%B1%D8%AC%D8%B3_%D8%B2%D9%83%D8%A7 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gerges Zakka جرجس زكا


A tag has been placed on Draft:Gerges Zakka جرجس زكا, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.    Kadzi    (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

There's no direct promotional or advertisal words in the page its just a profile about an Arab guy who's a writer and got many sites talking about him...are you deleting this out of racism or what exactly??? Because i see no other reason. Gatewoodandresye (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Gatewoodandresye, I am editor who declined your initial submission and debated the requesting deletion but chose to give you guidance which you did not follow. Another editor chose to request deletion and an admin reviewed that request and agreed.  To say any of us are racist is a personal attack which can lead to you being blocked so I suggest retracting that statement.  Since it has been deleted, I no longer have access to it but I can say from memory it read like a social media profile rather than an encyclopedia article.  In addition, it had no reliable sources to support any of the claims made. S0091 (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I gave you sites and linkes to his work but your site didn't even allow it .. if you dont wanna publish the thing.just go ahead Gatewoodandresye (talk) 20:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It clear you have not taken the time to read any of the material provided. What he has written or said is meaningless from a notability perspective.  What is needed are  reliable sources that are independent of him and have written in-depth about him or his work. For example, if three mainstream publications (such as newspapers or magazines) have devoted articles about him (not interviews or the like), that would meet notability and the draft should simply summarize what those publications wrote. If you have such sources you are welcome to submit another draft. S0091 (talk) 20:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I already did put 4 links to sites talking about the dude Gatewoodandresye (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)