User talk:Gatotsu911

List of Neon Genesis Evangelion episodes
Thanks for helping out on the list of Neon Genesis Evangelion episodes. A lot of work is needed. --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 18:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Rebuild sourcing
It's not at all a priority - since I vaguely remember seeing/hearing that somewhere as well - but I've been trying to better source Eva articles, so if you have spare time and can source Grant's statement, I'd be appreciative. --Gwern (contribs) 00:25 12 April 2007 (GMT)

Can you please tell us where you heard that Tiffany Grant is interested in returning to Rebuild of Evangelion? I don't mean this as a wiki-sourcing thing or anything; I'm just excited and curious.--Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 05:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

She said so on her Yahoo! fangroup (of which I'm a member). Yup. ^^ (Sorry it took me so long to respond) Gatotsu911 10:10, 11 July 2007 (-5 GMT)

A new Genesis
Gatotsu911, will you join us in creating a new Genesis for Mankind? --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 23:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sign up here --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 17:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Evangelion: Drive to Good Article status
I've been being a little slow about this, but (check the project page) we need to start brushing up the Evangelion articles to the point that they are "Good Article" status (it doesn't matter if they get Featured or something, just that they're good enough that they theoretically could be at that standard). This means making sure that they are EXACTLY in accordance with all of wikipedia's rules and regulations (i.e. gutting them of all of our own Analysis; i.e. on the episode articles and Angel names and such). This doesn't actually concern me that much. (What are you planning Ikari?--Keel) --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 21:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Images in Evangelion articles
As a signed-on participant of WikiProject Evangelion, I think we need to talk about the future of the images in the articles. Your input on the issue at the project's talk page is appreciated. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 03:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Eva 1.0 article
Hi, I'm copy-pasting this image to all you members in the Evangelion workgroup, since there seems to be no communication/to-do template in your workgroup yet (not sure if I have the time to join myself yet). The article on the newest movie needs serious help, particularly in converting listcruft to prose. Note that you may expose yourself to some spoilers if you choose to help. Evangelion: 1.0 You Are (Not) Alone. --GunnarRene 14:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Consensus poll on Rebuild of Eva 1.0
Folken keeps forcing his edits on the Rebuild of Eva 1.0 article and I keep reverting them to my version, and basically I feel that Folken is ordering us around even though he has no authority to do so because he is not an admin, and he didn't do much to help setting up these articles, only nitpicking on things we wrote. Be that as it may, I feel the only way to stop him from bullying us around is to make a formal vote at Talk:Evangelion: 1.0 You Are (Not) Alone for consensus. Heck, vote against my position if you feel that is the proper course of action; the point is that Folken does not have the authority to single-handedly constantly be laying down decisions like this and such decisions should be made, I feel, with the support of the whole project. --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici (talk) 23:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Sadness Page
I have replied to your comment on my talk, i never know whether to start the reply on the commenters talk or just reply on my talk. so thats why im leaving you this message to visit my talk Weeman com (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

# of Angels
I would actually prefer to revert https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=List_of_Angels_in_Neon_Genesis_Evangelion&curid=284020&diff=342553493&oldid=340966218 & https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Neon_Genesis_Evangelion_%28anime%29&curid=21711&diff=342552277&oldid=342417917

Unlike things like the Wall of Jericho (which specifically covered, even, in the Platinum commentaries), there's no evidence that the # of Angels was deliberate, and evidence that it was accidental: the original Proposal had far more angels than 18, Rebuild seems to be changing it, the TV & original movies were unsure and retconning the Angel sequence (and hence number), and then there's the quasi-canonical video games some of which add Angels. --Gwern (contribs) 20:26 8 February 2010 (GMT)


 * Actually, there's a heck of a lot more sourcing for other aspects: the Gainax commentary specifically calls out Asuka's Jericho allusion, for example. There are so many possible character names that Adam & Lilith must be deliberate, and so on.
 * The nature of numerology is that every number is significant somehow. Gematria doesn't have any uninteresting numbers; Bible codes will let you find anything. Notice how even secular Wikipedia has an article on every number twixt 0 and 100.
 * There can only be a max of 20 or so angels. Every number between 1 and 20 is easy to put religious interpretation on: http://www.biblestudy.org/bibleref/meaning-of-numbers-in-bible/11.html Even a layman can easily play this game: 10 refers to the 10 commandments; 12 is the 12 apostles of Jesus and the tribes of Israel; 13 is the apostles plus Matthias (Judas's replacement); etc.
 * Calling out the # of Angels is sufficiently groundless that I will employ guideline to remove it, despite my distaste for the relevant guidelines. --Gwern (contribs) 21:32 10 February 2010 (GMT)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)