User talk:Gauntman1

Your contributed article, Space efficient secret sharing


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Space efficient secret sharing. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Secret sharing. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Secret sharing – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JHU bal  27  01:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

I believe you are right. This article should be deleted since the information is already present elsewhere. Thanks for pointing this out. Gauntman1 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Kanada (philosopher) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kanada_%28philosopher%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kanada_%28philosopher%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Motion
 * Subhash Kak ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Subhash_Kak check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Subhash_Kak?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Kanada

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kanada (philosopher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motion ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kanada_%28philosopher%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kanada_%28philosopher%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Indic Script
Hello. There is a consensus not to add indic script in the article Lede and Infobox as per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. Regards - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Piggy bank cryptography for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piggy bank cryptography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Piggy bank cryptography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BenKuykendall (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)