User talk:Gaurav6523



Hello, Gaurav6523, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 02:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

DS Alert
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

India as superpower
Read WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:SYNTH.

Don't use those sources that make no mention of India becoming or not becoming "superpower". Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Aman.kumar.goel
 * how is that logical?
 * I mean there are tonnes of sources out here that don't mention it. Gaurav6523 (talk) 02:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You can remove those who don't mention "superpower" and you can also remove the information for which they have been used. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 02:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Aman.kumar.goel
 * Your point is illogical. All wikipedia articles have sources linked which have nothing to do with the title directly.
 * You don't seem to understand the concept of reference.
 * So listen me up,
 * a reference is a piece of date or information cited from credible primary or secondary sources, in order to back an assertion or argument.
 * Thus, the reference must be related to the particular assertion it's backing, while may or may not be related to the subject of the article. E.g. Here, the subject is related to "the factors that are hindering India from becoming a superpower". So, obviously caste system is one such factor. Now, the sources I cited backed my argument of how 'the Indian society is still considerably divided by caste in terms of marriage, income, health and wealth.' That's it, I mean't to say that a superpower nation must have united societies, less economic disparity and the citizens must see each other equal, beyond unnecessary social boundaries like the caste system (which is outdated and irrelevant to the 21st century India, which aspires to become a superpower). Gaurav6523 (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * consider ignoring the typos. Gaurav6523 (talk) 04:32, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This is not true because the United States is the only superpower right now, societies over there are not united either.
 * See WP:SYNTH. As long as the source does not relate to the problem with status of "superpower", you shouldn't do that either. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 16:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Aman.kumar.goel cite sources. As of 2019 the percentage of interracial marriages in US was 19‰ (much higher than intercaste marriages in india, which was about 5% as of 2017). Gaurav6523 (talk) 02:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * source:
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage_in_the_United_States#:~:text=4.6%25%20of%20married%20Black%20American,the%20least%20prevalent%20marital%20combination. Gaurav6523 (talk) 02:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Your own analysis does not matter. See WP:OR. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 13:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hi Gaurav6523! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Ayurveda several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 06:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Girth Summit  (blether) 06:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Further comment
Hi - two editors (including myself) have told you that they disagree with the change you want to make. You are welcome to use the article's talk page to propose the change and try to gain consensus, but repeatedly reinstating your change without consensus is disruptive. Please read through the links in the automated messages I have given you above. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 06:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Girth Summit ok sure, I wanna know all the points on which you don't want to approve my edit.
 * My point is simple: A summary should be to the point.
 * Look at the description of Homeopathy for reference.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy?wprov=sfla1 Gaurav6523 (talk) 07:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This is the wrong venue for discussion of the article's content; the article's talk page is for that. Go there to propose your change. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:50, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Warning
Your edits at Ayurveda show edit warring: 14 November 2022 + 20 November 2022 + 21 November 2022 + 21 November 2022. You will be blocked if that continues. See dispute resolution for standard procedures. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 08:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You are limited to one revert per 24 hrs on this article, which you're again in violation of. Someone's going to report you soon and you'll get blocked. Final warning Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)