User talk:Gauravsaral

Welcome!
Hello, Gauravsaral, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Dabangg. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RoCo (talk) 06:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Zakir Naik, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 05:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Popular Front of India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
Doug Weller talk 17:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Why are you adding "extremist and miliant" to Islamic groups and removing it from Indian groups
With this edit you added "extremist and militant" to an Islamic group with an edit summary "adding subject to lead for better defining the content" while with this edit you removed the same phrase from an Indian group saying"The controversies involving BD are covered in the article. No need to try to make a statement in the lead". More edits like this and you will probably be topic banned from the subject. Doug Weller talk 17:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chris_troutman, I am trying to make a point that there should be a standard and neutral POV for wiki articles. Indian Pages are generally written with a very negative POV, while pages like Tipu Sultan are white washed without any data

Also thanks for reaching out Dough Weller, I hope we can reach a point where there are same standards for pages irrespective of the community associated with them. You can clearly see the same admin having different approach in Tipu Sultan and in Bajrang Dal


 * You'd better read WP:POINT. Doug Weller  talk 19:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

can you please take a look at this page [Bajrang Dal], very hard to keep cool when whole wiki admin community is biased against a religion

December 2017
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Tipu Sultan. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chris_troutman, I am trying to make a point that there should be a standard and neutral POV for wiki articles. Indian Pages are generally written with a very negative POV, while pages like Tipu Sultan are white washed without any data

Also thanks for reaching out Dough Weller, I hope we can reach a point where there are same standards for pages irrespective of the community associated with them. You can clearly see the same admin having different approach in Tipu Sultan and in Bajrang Dal

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanamonde (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Re your comment on WT:IN
Hi. Regarding your comment *Comment: It should not be Gauravsarai's it is GauravSaral's. do note that your username is Gauravsarai with a lower case s. Generally, on Wikipedia, you will be addressed by either your username or whatever name you choose to use in your signature. If you prefer to be addressed as GauravSarai, you should consider modifying your signature (click on "Preferences" on the top right of the page, then on "User profile" and modify the contents of the signature box). Best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 01:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 14:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you continue you are likely to be blocked from editing. Doug Weller  talk 14:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)