User talk:Gauravsinghmpi

July 2017
You have been blocked for 31 hours from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You were warned sufficiently about WP:OWN. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked 1 week from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You were warned sufficiently about WP:OWN. You were blocked for it. You requested an unblock with "...i will not do it again...". I unblocked you. Within hours, you did the same thing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar. Muhandes (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

In fact, the content you added was copy pasted from here and other sites. Please remember that you must write in your own words. You cannot copy and paste from other websites. For further information, please read Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask.

Now, about your future edits in general: They must be sourced with references. If they are reverted for any reason, do not put them back. Use the article talk page instead to discuss things. If you add unsourced text again, you may be blocked from editing indefinitely without further notice. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please don't add honorifics against MOS:DOCTOR Muhandes (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, please don't add citations to headings, see WP:CITE. --Muhandes (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, per WP:UNIGUIDE don't list courses. --Muhandes (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Gauravsinghmpi, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajkiya Engineering College, Ambedkar Nagar. Muhandes (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Do you wish to be permanently blocked?
I thought two blocks would be enough but I see you have not learned anything. here you added data about admission without a source. Worst than that, here you added a bogus source to the section which doesn't mention the facts at all. Please stop. --Muhandes (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rec,Ambedkarnagar


Hello, Gauravsinghmpi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rec,Ambedkarnagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 16:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rajkiya_engineering_college_ambedkar_nagar Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chenzw&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rajkiya_engineering_college_ambedkar_nagar reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chenzw   Talk   06:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nirmal contractors


A tag has been placed on Nirmal contractors, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  15:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nirmal contractors
Hello Gauravsinghmpi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nirmal contractors for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mr RD  11:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rskushwahabsp.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Rskushwahabsp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term disruptive editing in various forms: copyright violations, WP:OWN, advertising, WP:POV etc and unwillingness to respond to feedback or adhere to policies. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Sir,now i understand why i am blocked, actually i not copied the content.But actually i was not uploaded it by the particular path i will not do such thing again and contribute to the community.So,please unblock me. Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 13:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar


Hello, Gauravsinghmpi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajkiya engineering college ambedkar nagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 09:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)