User talk:Gautham offl

Welcome Gautham offl! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,521,516 registered editors!

Hello Gautham offl. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, SUN EYE 1  08:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)    [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suneye1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Raashi Khanna
I've opened as discussion at Talk:Raashi Khanna. Kindly, reply there. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Watch video cited as number4 for lady shri ram college(lsr) info. from timestamp 16:05 to 16:13 Gautham offl (talk) 11:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Bro if you wanted clarification on any topic related to Raashi Khanna you can ask me. I have a better knowledge about her with valid information, all self-confessed by herself in interviews(I've watched all stuffs) Gautham offl (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks mate. I'll consult with you. I lived in Karnataka, so apart from a little bit (swalpa) of understanding of Kannada and some Telugu. Also kindly mention timestamp next time you add a video source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Sure bro, I am Tamil and i can understand hindi,telugu and i'll mention timestamp the next time if i want to add some videos Gautham offl (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

==

Hii.. I never see such type of person who is defending for wiki especially for actress.. I saw that u are from tn.where r u from??. Are you raashi's die hard fan bro??. Why are you doing like this? Don't mind anything if it bothers u.. I just wanna ask Kingshravan04 (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I love her that's it, I love to do this edits. So, I make sure that I myself get updated about her 'everyday' so I can share necessary information in Wikipedia with citations.
 * Die hard fan means that he/she only writes positive stuffs about her and as a Wikipedia editor I have to be unbiased. Hence, I do mention information about her film flops and when it gets negative reviews and try to be honest and unbiased in my edits.
 * Before my first-ever edit in her Wikipage, the page looked totally obsolete with old information and I took up as a task to edit this page with updated information with valid source and since then, I do take care of her page a lot as 60% of the content in that page was added by me with official source. Maybe since a lot of content in this page was added by me, I have some connect with this page that makes me to do edits often and remove unnecessary edits that violates any official information regarding Raashii.
 * I hope you got your answer, Thank You Gautham offl (talk) 05:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Very good bro.. Congrats. Kingshravan04 (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

November 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aranmanai 3, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. -  SUN EYE 1  17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Why did you revert? I made those edits since the sentences were poorly constructed and those citations were from sources which are unknown and not-so-popular media outlets. Gautham offl (talk) 05:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * What media outlets do you mean by "not-so-popular media outlets"? -  SUN EYE 1  05:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Media outlets which readers are unheard of and are relatively new. Compared to the other media sources that were in the news field for years and readers knew about it and often read their articles for a long time.

Like say for an example if I start a news outlet tomorrow and I write or share an information, readers tend to have reservations on my article that whether my content is true or not. This skepticism doesn't hit the readers when it comes to reading information from the media outlets like The Hindu, TOI etc because readers have been reading their articles for years and have faith on their source as they majorly post only valid or officially confirmed information that doesn't tend to go wrong.

Dear editor friend, Long back when I started editing wikipages as a newbie, Even I used to put some random source as a citation and whatever the source I attached, they were removed by senior editors in wikipedia and they suggested me to add only those sources as a citation which is from the media outlets that are widely recognised and accepted by all readers and which has a detailed information about a topic discussed in a wikipage. Since then, I only attach those sources as citation which are from widely acknowledged media outlets, as suggested by fellow senior editors.

This is what I meant while saying "not-so-popular" media outlets.

Despite after reading my view on this above, if you have any reservations or suggestions you are welcome friend. I am still a learning editor open to suggestions from seniors and accepting my faults so that I shall make correct edits in the future by abiding to the wikipedia rules and guidelines.

Thank You. Gautham offl (talk) 12:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Gautham offl (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

International Business Times
I have started a discussion at Talk:Raashii Khanna. Would you care to provide your input? Geniac (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I am sorry, I had some personal works hence I couldn't search for alternate sources. I will now start my search and look for alternatives. It'll be done by today. Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 10:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Editor, The links that you feel as unreliable are the only available source(s) of events that happened almost a decade ago. Indeed the box office reports of those films are true but these sources are either unavailable or available in a format that Wikipedia doesn't allow editors to add them. In today's period, it is easy to find sources unlike few years ago. I don't find International Business Times as unreliable. Rather I found some citations that had no connection with what the topic actually is. I hope you can understand. To summarize, It is a scenario where either there are only limited sources available on the internet as a proof to the box office verdict of earliest films of Raashi Khanna, or there are sources which are available in the format that Wikipedia doesn't approve in adding them. Anyways trying my best. Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You said The links that you feel as unreliable. No, it's more the case that it is consensus that IBT is unreliable, not that I "feel" that it is. I don't find International Business Times as unreliable. Okay, but consensus is that it is unreliable, which is what matters. Please see WP:IBTIMES. It is Wikipedia policy (Verifiability) that all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. If a claim is only attributable to an unreliable source, then there is no justification for including that claim in an article at all. Geniac (talk) 06:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please check the page once again. Inspite of my conversation with you, I have changed the links. Thanks. Gautham offl (talk) 18:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)