User talk:Gauze123

September 2007
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Physics, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oli Filth 22:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Normal Except Banrey FC000.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Normal Except Banrey FC000.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Normal Except Banaray FC
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Normal Except Banaray FC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Normal Except Banaray FC. Bearian (talk) 20:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
The criteria for speedy deletion state that an article about an organisation that makes no claim to its notability or significance may be speedily deleted by an administrator at any time (rule A7). The article, as far as I could see - unlike Ebbsfleet or Havant & Waterlooville, who have both played in the senior national cup competition and have been featured in the national media - made no such claim to notability, and blatantly falls short given that it is for under-16s and does not compete at a senior level. One of the central tenets of the Wikipedia project is that it only covers subjects that are notable. Your article failed to meet this criterion by a long way, hence why it was deleted. Qwghlm (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sunday Night Show has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 00:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)