User talk:Gaviidae

Welcome
Hi Gaviidae, awesome work with the radiography page. I dig it. Thanks for enhancing my earlier rewrite.

Philipcosson 19:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Overkantboek.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Overkantboek.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Gaviidae
Yes. I agree that Home Power has been soccer mommed, so what. I don't mind. I have no problem reading a soccer mommed magazine, if that's what it takes to make energy conservation/generation popular. Statistically speaking it's the women who drag their men to church more than the other way around, because they are the more "caring" and more social of the two sexes, they care about community and parading the family before the community, so if it takes women to start caring about the environment and renewables, what's wrong soccer momming a magazine? It's better to have women hyped up about home power than aspiring to get the latest biggest Suburban SUV's to parade in or diet/anorexia. There is still enough juice in the magazine for the husband Joe Schmuckenburger's too - not that women don't love power tools and building something with their own hands - hands on issues, and some ads about startup kits you can buy, even if some of them are scams just by looking at the design. For instance, the beauty of windmill blades in a picture tells me so much about the rest of the whole kit. When you just see a metal stamped sheet with blades cut/folded out of it with a big flat face obstruction to the wind and small swept blade area, sitting on a tiny pole secured by wires, you can tell the seller is more into profit than love of his art, you can tell that the ad is a scam, no matter how low $99.99 or $199.99 or $999.99 a system is. But then again, there are very nice designs, and there is nothing like a startup kit to get you started. Sillybilly 03:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi again Gaviidae, I've attempted to edit the Aspirin & CRC prevention, following your advices. I am not very happy with the style: would you be so kind to re-edit it, please? The double link to "Chemoprevention database" is heavy, but it does not refer to the same page, and, as you told me, people may have difficulties to specifically find the "aspirin" data in the database. Corpet 14:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Aspirin and cancer

History of electrochemistry
Thanks for your message. I'll have a look later today. --Guinnog 18:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You're probably right that it should be written in UK English. I mainly changed it because aluminium is the accepted scientific spelling as agreed by IUPAC though. I will do more work on it when I have the chance. --Guinnog 18:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Radiography
I'm coming at the article from a more general physics viewpoint. Both gamma rays and x-rays can be created from many sources. The original wording was as follows:
 * A photon is an X-ray when it is formed by an event involving an electron, while the photon is a gamma ray when it comes from the nucleus of an atom.

To me, this implied that x-rays are ALWAYS created via electrons and gamma rays ALWAYS from the nucleus. Since those are not true (all wavelengths can be created via blackbody radiation, and other methods for those two are listed on their pages), I changed the wording to what you saw:
 * Medical usage X-ray photons are more likely to be formed by an event involving an electron, while gamma ray photons are more likely to be formed from the nucleus of an atom.

I do not have a source for the original wording, so I stuck on the tag indicating a source is needed.

I do not know the radiography context as well, and you may be correct that the phrase "medical usage" is redundant, but can you suggest another wording that would not imply a universal way that x-rays and gamma rays are created, but that these are primarily how they're created for radiography purposes? --zandperl 01:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I was just passing through - I was looking up instances in which vets might need to sedate pet birds, and someone mentioned radiography, and I wasn't clear if that was different from x-rays. I'll keep an eye on the page, but probably won't contribute much b/c other than that one issue I don't know much about the subject.  Good luck!  --zandperl 13:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

response to your question
I'm sorry that I cannot help because I've never touched to high voltage system on the Prius. However, I'd suggest you contact Felix Kramer at http://www.calcars.org. He should know a lot since his company converts the Prius into plug-in hybrids. Kowloonese 22:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

File:Overkantboek.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Overkantboek.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 06:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)