User talk:GayOrdinaryChristian

September 2019
Hello, I'm Creffett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Leviticus 18, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. creffett (talk) 00:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. creffett (talk) 00:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, please use reliable sources. www.gaychristian101.com is not a reliable source. its a self-publishing source.--SharabSalam (talk) 00:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Grammar
There is no "bias message"--consider "biased message". Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

The biased message is "Every place it is mentioned it is referred to in a negative light. The teaching from the Scriptures are clearly against homosexual behavior of any kind." It is someone's interpretation and opinion that "the teaching from the Scriptures are clearly against homosexual behavior of any kind." In my opinion and interpretation the scriptures doesn't prohibit homosexuality. But I do not display my opinion as fact on Wikipedia. 01:20, User:GayOrdinaryChristian 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but blah blah blah. "Bias message" is improper English. I'm glad you said "biased message" in your response. Drmies (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

MDPI
Has been listed as a predatory publisher and thus not a suitable source either. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This source is too old. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2571445
 * The sources also do not appear to mention UTIs? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Drive-by tagging and WP:OR
When you add maintenance templates to an article, as you did at Salvation in Christianity diff diff, Ethics in the Bible diff, and Women in the Bible diff, please provide a rationale at the talk. And this, at The Bible and slavery, adding a tag that more secondary citations are needed diff, and then next interpreting a primary source, which is WP:OR, is not very constructive either. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  05:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm assuming it's not the leads you're thinking of, see WP:LEADCITE? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't know; it's just not clear to me why those tags were added. No rationale was provided. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  18:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the indent,, question was for GOC, based on edits like . Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Okay. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  19:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)