User talk:Gayehop

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Not vandalism
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Principality of Sealand, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 12:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying me about this. Gayehop (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Your recent editing history at Principality of Sealand shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You've performed 3 reverts in less than 24 hours, so you cannot make any further reverts. DrKay (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Have you any relationship with Sealand?
See WP:COI and WP:PAID. Your edits certainly suggest you do. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lord Vassil Gilbert


The page Lord Vassil Gilbert has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to September 11 attacks has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: September 11 attacks was changed by Gayehop (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852724 on 2020-08-06T17:33:34+00:00